An important issue in bibliometrics is the weighting of co-authorship in the production of scientific collaborations, which are becoming the standard modality of research activity in many disciplines. The problem is especially relevant in the field of high-energy physics, where collaborations reach 3000 authors, but it can no longer be ignored also in other domains, like medicine or biology. We present theoretical and numerical arguments in favour of weighing the individual contributions as 1/Naut where Naut is the number of co-authors. When counting citations we suggest the exponent α ≈ 1, that corresponds to fractional counting. When counting the number of papers we suggest α ≈ 1/3 − 1/2, with the former (latter) value more appropriate ...
This paper focuses on the properties of the matching process which leads to scientific collaboration...
Background: Although scientometry gradually became prevalent way of measuring one's research output,...
Abstract Purpose To give a theoretical framework...
An important issue in bibliometrics is the weighting of co-authorship in the production of scientifi...
Collaboration among researchers is becoming increasingly common, which raises a large number of scie...
This paper studies the assignment of responsibility to the participants in the case of co-authored s...
The aim of this paper is to extend our knowledge about the power-law relationship between citation-b...
Acknowledgments are one of many conventions by which researchers publicly bestow recognition towards...
International audienceUniversities looking to recruit or to rank researchers have to attribute credi...
I propose a new method (Pareto weights) to objectively attribute citations to co-authors. Previous m...
I propose a new method (Pareto weights) to objectively attribute citations to co-authors. Previous m...
The discussion about how to treat author self-citations driven by policy application and quality mea...
This paper analyzes the relationship among research collaboration, number of documents and number of...
We develop and propose a new counting method at the aggregate level for contributions to scientific ...
Publication activity, citation impact and communication patterns, in general, change in the course o...
This paper focuses on the properties of the matching process which leads to scientific collaboration...
Background: Although scientometry gradually became prevalent way of measuring one's research output,...
Abstract Purpose To give a theoretical framework...
An important issue in bibliometrics is the weighting of co-authorship in the production of scientifi...
Collaboration among researchers is becoming increasingly common, which raises a large number of scie...
This paper studies the assignment of responsibility to the participants in the case of co-authored s...
The aim of this paper is to extend our knowledge about the power-law relationship between citation-b...
Acknowledgments are one of many conventions by which researchers publicly bestow recognition towards...
International audienceUniversities looking to recruit or to rank researchers have to attribute credi...
I propose a new method (Pareto weights) to objectively attribute citations to co-authors. Previous m...
I propose a new method (Pareto weights) to objectively attribute citations to co-authors. Previous m...
The discussion about how to treat author self-citations driven by policy application and quality mea...
This paper analyzes the relationship among research collaboration, number of documents and number of...
We develop and propose a new counting method at the aggregate level for contributions to scientific ...
Publication activity, citation impact and communication patterns, in general, change in the course o...
This paper focuses on the properties of the matching process which leads to scientific collaboration...
Background: Although scientometry gradually became prevalent way of measuring one's research output,...
Abstract Purpose To give a theoretical framework...