Objectives This study sought to investigate differences in outcome between patients treated with successful strict, failed strict, and lenient rate control. Background The RACE II (Rate Control Efficacy in Permanent Atrial Fibrillation) study showed no difference in outcome between lenient and strict rate control in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation (AF). However, in the strict group not all patients achieved the pre-defined heart rate target. Methods The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. For the current analysis outcome events were analyzed from end of the dose-adjustment phase until end of follow-up (median 2.9 years [interquartile range: 2.4 to 3.0 years]). Of 614 patients, 608 completed...
Background: Rate control is often the therapy of choice for atrial fibrillation. Guidelines recommen...
ObjectivesThis study sought to investigate differences in outcome between patients treated with succ...
It is unknown whether lenient rate control is an acceptable strategy in patients with AF and heart f...
Objectives This study sought to investigate differences in outcome between patients treated with suc...
Objectives This study sought to investigate differences in outcome between patients treated with suc...
Objectives This study sought to investigate differences in outcome between patients treated with suc...
Objectives This study sought to investigate differences in outcome between patients treated with suc...
Objectives This study sought to investigate differences in outcome between patients treated with suc...
Objectives This study sought to investigate differences in outcome between patients treated with suc...
Objectives This study sought to investigate differences in outcome between patients treated with suc...
ObjectivesThis study sought to investigate differences in outcome between patients treated with succ...
BACKGROUND: Recent studies demonstrated that rate control is an acceptable alternative for rhythm co...
Background Recent studies demonstrated that rate control is an acceptable alternative for rhythm con...
Background: Rate control is often the therapy of choice for atrial fibrillation. Guidelines recommen...
BACKGROUND: Recent studies demonstrated that rate control is an acceptable alternative for rhythm co...
Background: Rate control is often the therapy of choice for atrial fibrillation. Guidelines recommen...
ObjectivesThis study sought to investigate differences in outcome between patients treated with succ...
It is unknown whether lenient rate control is an acceptable strategy in patients with AF and heart f...
Objectives This study sought to investigate differences in outcome between patients treated with suc...
Objectives This study sought to investigate differences in outcome between patients treated with suc...
Objectives This study sought to investigate differences in outcome between patients treated with suc...
Objectives This study sought to investigate differences in outcome between patients treated with suc...
Objectives This study sought to investigate differences in outcome between patients treated with suc...
Objectives This study sought to investigate differences in outcome between patients treated with suc...
Objectives This study sought to investigate differences in outcome between patients treated with suc...
ObjectivesThis study sought to investigate differences in outcome between patients treated with succ...
BACKGROUND: Recent studies demonstrated that rate control is an acceptable alternative for rhythm co...
Background Recent studies demonstrated that rate control is an acceptable alternative for rhythm con...
Background: Rate control is often the therapy of choice for atrial fibrillation. Guidelines recommen...
BACKGROUND: Recent studies demonstrated that rate control is an acceptable alternative for rhythm co...
Background: Rate control is often the therapy of choice for atrial fibrillation. Guidelines recommen...
ObjectivesThis study sought to investigate differences in outcome between patients treated with succ...
It is unknown whether lenient rate control is an acceptable strategy in patients with AF and heart f...