In this paper a not too unrealistic example of analogical case-based reasoning is presented first. Then this example is analysed with the help of an existing model of case-based reasoning. After that the model is extended with a few more complex logical mechanisms known from general. theories of legal argumentation. This extension turns out to allow for a number of new patterns of reasoning on analogy, examples of which are presented informally. Then a number of other existing approaches to case-based reasoning are briefly discussed. It turns out that these approaches do not deal satisfactorily with the reasoning patterns uncovered in this paper
This paper deals with two issues in the field of reasoning by analogy in the law. The one issue is w...
Analogy has many important functions in the domain of law. Since the number of legal rules is restri...
Comparison between cases is a core issue in case-based reasoning. In this paper, we discuss a logica...
In this paper a not too unrealistic example of analogical case-based reasoning is presented first. T...
Case-based reasoning in the law is a reasoning strategy in which legal conclusions are supported by ...
This doctoral dissertation is a study on analogy-based arguments in law. Its overarching aim is to c...
Use of analogy within the legal domain was examined, making reference both to normative reasoning an...
Formalizing case-based reasoning is an important topic in AI and Law, which has been discussed using...
Traditional legal perspectives on analogical reasoning in law posit that legal reasoning involves th...
In this paper, it is shown (1) that there are two schemes for argument from analogy that seem to be ...
This Article defends the practice of reasoning by analogy on the basis of its epistemic and institut...
Analogical reasoning is a pervasive feature of the common law, yet its structure and rational force ...
The paper offers a formal model of analogical legal reasoning and takes the model to data. Under the...
AbstractReasoning with cases has been a primary focus of those working in AI and law who have attemp...
This paper deals with two issues in the field of reasoning by analogy in the law. The one issue is w...
Analogy has many important functions in the domain of law. Since the number of legal rules is restri...
Comparison between cases is a core issue in case-based reasoning. In this paper, we discuss a logica...
In this paper a not too unrealistic example of analogical case-based reasoning is presented first. T...
Case-based reasoning in the law is a reasoning strategy in which legal conclusions are supported by ...
This doctoral dissertation is a study on analogy-based arguments in law. Its overarching aim is to c...
Use of analogy within the legal domain was examined, making reference both to normative reasoning an...
Formalizing case-based reasoning is an important topic in AI and Law, which has been discussed using...
Traditional legal perspectives on analogical reasoning in law posit that legal reasoning involves th...
In this paper, it is shown (1) that there are two schemes for argument from analogy that seem to be ...
This Article defends the practice of reasoning by analogy on the basis of its epistemic and institut...
Analogical reasoning is a pervasive feature of the common law, yet its structure and rational force ...
The paper offers a formal model of analogical legal reasoning and takes the model to data. Under the...
AbstractReasoning with cases has been a primary focus of those working in AI and law who have attemp...
This paper deals with two issues in the field of reasoning by analogy in the law. The one issue is w...
Analogy has many important functions in the domain of law. Since the number of legal rules is restri...
Comparison between cases is a core issue in case-based reasoning. In this paper, we discuss a logica...