Since the 1700s, peer review has been a part of scientific publication. Quality peer reviews take extensive time and effort yet reviewers are not often compensated. This editorial announces the new offering of the National Certification Board for Thereputic Massage & Bodywork (NCBTMB)-approved continuing education hours for our peer reviewers who complete timely reviews. Instructions to register as a peer reviewer and how to conduct a review are offered. Thank you to our 2016 and 2017 peer reviewers
BACKGROUND: Peer reviewing for medical education journals is an art, a privilege, a responsibility a...
Selecting peer reviewers is a crucial stage of the editorial process that ensures the quality of sch...
Peer review is widely used system for evaluating manuscripts prior to publication. It has been and s...
Peer review is a mainstay of scientific publishing and, while peer reviewers and scientists r...
The purpose of peer review is to uphold the integrity of the publishing journal, improve upon resear...
The practice of peer review is essential to ensure academic quality of articles published in profess...
Introduction: Scholarly peer review is the cornerstone for maintaining quality and relevance in the ...
In academia, peer review functions as a quality-assurance mechanism which also aims to improve the s...
There is little dispute that peer review will remain as a means of quality control and certification...
Peer review is one way scholarly journals can maintain rigor and increase the quality of published m...
Editors and publishers of scholarly journals rarely agree on what makes for a good publication; they...
Abstract Current scholarly publications heavily rely on high quality peer review. Peer review, albei...
This open access volume explores peer review in the scientific community and academia. While peer re...
Despite criticism and allegations of suppressing innovative ideas, Peer Review is widely cited as ce...
The peer review process is undergoing transformation; this raises a series of challenges, some of wh...
BACKGROUND: Peer reviewing for medical education journals is an art, a privilege, a responsibility a...
Selecting peer reviewers is a crucial stage of the editorial process that ensures the quality of sch...
Peer review is widely used system for evaluating manuscripts prior to publication. It has been and s...
Peer review is a mainstay of scientific publishing and, while peer reviewers and scientists r...
The purpose of peer review is to uphold the integrity of the publishing journal, improve upon resear...
The practice of peer review is essential to ensure academic quality of articles published in profess...
Introduction: Scholarly peer review is the cornerstone for maintaining quality and relevance in the ...
In academia, peer review functions as a quality-assurance mechanism which also aims to improve the s...
There is little dispute that peer review will remain as a means of quality control and certification...
Peer review is one way scholarly journals can maintain rigor and increase the quality of published m...
Editors and publishers of scholarly journals rarely agree on what makes for a good publication; they...
Abstract Current scholarly publications heavily rely on high quality peer review. Peer review, albei...
This open access volume explores peer review in the scientific community and academia. While peer re...
Despite criticism and allegations of suppressing innovative ideas, Peer Review is widely cited as ce...
The peer review process is undergoing transformation; this raises a series of challenges, some of wh...
BACKGROUND: Peer reviewing for medical education journals is an art, a privilege, a responsibility a...
Selecting peer reviewers is a crucial stage of the editorial process that ensures the quality of sch...
Peer review is widely used system for evaluating manuscripts prior to publication. It has been and s...