In December 2004, in a pair of cases, the Appellate Division, First Department, held that under state labor and tort laws, injured workers who are not legally permitted to be present or employed in the United States are only entitled to receive lost earnings reflecting what they could have earned in their country of origin. This article explores these First Department decisions by first discussing the federal statutory and decisional backdrop against which the cases arose. This article then provides a discussion of the First Department cases and the competing economic incentives they implicate. Finally, this article posits that a more appropriate balance of federal immigration law and New York State Labor Law § 240 policy is a rule that hol...
Should a nation extend legal rights to those who enter the country illegally? The Supreme Court rece...
Over the past several decades, there has been an unmistakable tension between labor law and immigrat...
Undocumented aliens who seek to enforce their rights against their employer in state court will ofte...
In December 2004, in a pair of cases, the Appellate Division, First Department, held that under stat...
The Supreme Court\u27s decision in Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. NLRB significantly restricted ...
This Article argues that sound public policy supports states providing vocational rehabilitation ser...
In Hoffman Plastic Compounds v. NLRB, 535 U.S. 137 (2002), the United States Supreme Court held that...
In Local 512 v. NLRB, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ordered the National Labor Relations Board ...
This Article examines the legal status and rights of undocumented workers under the National Labor R...
Congress enacted the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) in 1935 in order to level the bargaining po...
This article previews the Supreme Court case Hoffman Plastic Compound, Inc., v. NLRB, 535 U.S. 137 (...
This Note explains why the Supreme Court\u27s decision in Hoffman threatens to do the exact opposite...
On March 27, 2002, The United State Supreme Court ruled in Hoffman Plastic Compounds v. N.L.R.B. tha...
[Excerpt] This Article endeavors to comprehensively outline the emerging field of immployment law. ...
Immigration law is a hotly contested topic these days. Not only does it have important implications ...
Should a nation extend legal rights to those who enter the country illegally? The Supreme Court rece...
Over the past several decades, there has been an unmistakable tension between labor law and immigrat...
Undocumented aliens who seek to enforce their rights against their employer in state court will ofte...
In December 2004, in a pair of cases, the Appellate Division, First Department, held that under stat...
The Supreme Court\u27s decision in Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. NLRB significantly restricted ...
This Article argues that sound public policy supports states providing vocational rehabilitation ser...
In Hoffman Plastic Compounds v. NLRB, 535 U.S. 137 (2002), the United States Supreme Court held that...
In Local 512 v. NLRB, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ordered the National Labor Relations Board ...
This Article examines the legal status and rights of undocumented workers under the National Labor R...
Congress enacted the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) in 1935 in order to level the bargaining po...
This article previews the Supreme Court case Hoffman Plastic Compound, Inc., v. NLRB, 535 U.S. 137 (...
This Note explains why the Supreme Court\u27s decision in Hoffman threatens to do the exact opposite...
On March 27, 2002, The United State Supreme Court ruled in Hoffman Plastic Compounds v. N.L.R.B. tha...
[Excerpt] This Article endeavors to comprehensively outline the emerging field of immployment law. ...
Immigration law is a hotly contested topic these days. Not only does it have important implications ...
Should a nation extend legal rights to those who enter the country illegally? The Supreme Court rece...
Over the past several decades, there has been an unmistakable tension between labor law and immigrat...
Undocumented aliens who seek to enforce their rights against their employer in state court will ofte...