Add to ORKGIf, as a result of taking Indeterminacy seriously, we revolutionize the way we teach law and the way we select judges, then we will also revolutionize the way cases are litigated (because the new judges will expect to hear a different kind of argumentation) and the way people order their lives in anticipation of the way their disputes will be decided by these new judges
From the introduction: As legal theorists, we live in an age of self-conscious repetition: everythin...
How should judges decide the cases presented to them? In our system the answer is, “according to law...
This Essay begins by examining whether more precise codification of statutory scope of review langua...
If, as a result of taking Indeterminacy seriously, we revolutionize the way we teach law and the way...
Judges currently face a daunting task. On the one hand, they are increasingly aware of the indetermi...
Critical legal scholarship challenges the liberal claim that modern western societies are characteri...
The main claim of this paper is the following: In a typical rational legal system, legal adjudicatio...
Deconstruction has already happened on the Supreme Court. Not only can no member of the Court reall...
Legal indeterminacy--the extent to which any particular legal theory cannot provide knowable answers...
For over a generation, academic jurisprudence and constitutional theory have attempted to reconcile,...
Today\u27s conflicts scholars no doubt consider themselves a diverse bunch, with widely differing vi...
This paper challenges the Critical Legal Studies (CLS) claims of legal indeterminacy. It shall use a...
In this review of JasonWhitehead’s new book Judging judges, I explore the four broad types of judici...
The claim that legal disputes have no determinate answer is an old one. The worry is one that assail...
The thesis of this Article is that the indeterminacy that plagues American law is Made in America. ...
From the introduction: As legal theorists, we live in an age of self-conscious repetition: everythin...
How should judges decide the cases presented to them? In our system the answer is, “according to law...
This Essay begins by examining whether more precise codification of statutory scope of review langua...
If, as a result of taking Indeterminacy seriously, we revolutionize the way we teach law and the way...
Judges currently face a daunting task. On the one hand, they are increasingly aware of the indetermi...
Critical legal scholarship challenges the liberal claim that modern western societies are characteri...
The main claim of this paper is the following: In a typical rational legal system, legal adjudicatio...
Deconstruction has already happened on the Supreme Court. Not only can no member of the Court reall...
Legal indeterminacy--the extent to which any particular legal theory cannot provide knowable answers...
For over a generation, academic jurisprudence and constitutional theory have attempted to reconcile,...
Today\u27s conflicts scholars no doubt consider themselves a diverse bunch, with widely differing vi...
This paper challenges the Critical Legal Studies (CLS) claims of legal indeterminacy. It shall use a...
In this review of JasonWhitehead’s new book Judging judges, I explore the four broad types of judici...
The claim that legal disputes have no determinate answer is an old one. The worry is one that assail...
The thesis of this Article is that the indeterminacy that plagues American law is Made in America. ...
From the introduction: As legal theorists, we live in an age of self-conscious repetition: everythin...
How should judges decide the cases presented to them? In our system the answer is, “according to law...
This Essay begins by examining whether more precise codification of statutory scope of review langua...