This Student Note investigates the history and intent underlying the controlling person liability provisions of the 1933 and 1934 Securities Act. It notes that courts have adopted a ranges of standards for holding controlling persons liability, but whichever standard is chosen--that standard is applied to both Acts. This note argues that courts should impose unique liability standards for each statute in order to fully realize Congress\u27 purpose in adopting the laws
The ease of becoming judgment proof in Texas, with liberal exemptions from execution of judgment, ma...
This Article explains the failings of the Securities and Exchange Commission in dealing with resales...
This Article analyzes the elements of Section 16(b) of the 1934 Securities Exchange Act, as well as ...
This Student Note investigates the history and intent underlying the controlling person liability pr...
In the last fifteen years, Congress has enacted Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, The Private Secu...
On May 21, 1942 the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to section 10(b) of the Securities ...
Section 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 creates two private rights of action, each providing in rel...
With the boom and bust of the twenties and thirties, there developed a new legal concept-regulation ...
This article deals with certain civil liabilities created by the Securities Act of 1933 and the Secu...
Remedies under the Securities Act of 1933, together with the class action device, are the most effec...
In the last two decades, massive financial scandals have impaired the integrity of the financial mar...
The purpose of this note is to evaluate the ramifications of this particular proposed amendment to t...
Securities regulation deals primarily with the laws preventing and providing remedies for fraud in t...
In 1988, in response to rampant insider trading during the 1980s, Congress passed the Insider Tradin...
In recent years, insider trading has become a publicized focus of securities law enforcement. The de...
The ease of becoming judgment proof in Texas, with liberal exemptions from execution of judgment, ma...
This Article explains the failings of the Securities and Exchange Commission in dealing with resales...
This Article analyzes the elements of Section 16(b) of the 1934 Securities Exchange Act, as well as ...
This Student Note investigates the history and intent underlying the controlling person liability pr...
In the last fifteen years, Congress has enacted Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, The Private Secu...
On May 21, 1942 the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to section 10(b) of the Securities ...
Section 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 creates two private rights of action, each providing in rel...
With the boom and bust of the twenties and thirties, there developed a new legal concept-regulation ...
This article deals with certain civil liabilities created by the Securities Act of 1933 and the Secu...
Remedies under the Securities Act of 1933, together with the class action device, are the most effec...
In the last two decades, massive financial scandals have impaired the integrity of the financial mar...
The purpose of this note is to evaluate the ramifications of this particular proposed amendment to t...
Securities regulation deals primarily with the laws preventing and providing remedies for fraud in t...
In 1988, in response to rampant insider trading during the 1980s, Congress passed the Insider Tradin...
In recent years, insider trading has become a publicized focus of securities law enforcement. The de...
The ease of becoming judgment proof in Texas, with liberal exemptions from execution of judgment, ma...
This Article explains the failings of the Securities and Exchange Commission in dealing with resales...
This Article analyzes the elements of Section 16(b) of the 1934 Securities Exchange Act, as well as ...