Add to ORKGThe article presents the main features of a theory of responsibility and the conditions that determine who can and cannot be held responsible, with a focus on different types of incapacity for responsible behaviour. The article has four parts. The first three parts answer the following questions: what is responsibility; what is capacity for responsible behaviour; and, what is incapacity for responsible behaviour. Part four answers some possible objections. The answers are based on Antonio Damasio’s understanding of the mind, Manuel Vargas’ revisionary theory of responsibility, and previous work by the author on free will
This chapter focuses on the relationship between liability in (criminal) law, responsibility, and re...
This article identifies a novel challenge to standard understandings of responsibility practices, an...
This paper tries to develop an epistemological analysis on the notion of responsibility. After point...
This article is concerned with the conflict between two theories of moral responsibility for wrongdo...
This article is concerned with the conflict between two theories of moral responsibility for wrongdo...
This article is concerned with the conflict between two theories of moral responsibility for wrongdo...
This article is concerned with the conflict between two theories of moral responsibility for wrongdo...
Responsibility is impossible because there is no responsibility-maker and there needs to be one if p...
Responsibility is impossible because there is no responsibility-maker and there needs to be one if p...
Responsibility is impossible because there is no responsibility-maker and there needs to be one if p...
This chapter focuses on the relationship between liability in (criminal) law, responsibility, and re...
[Note: articles 1-5 are in English; Intro, Discussion, and Conclusion are in Portuguese.] Responsibi...
[Note: articles 1-5 are in English; Intro, Discussion, and Conclusion are in Portuguese.] Responsibi...
This article identifies a novel challenge to standard understandings of responsibility practices, an...
This article identifies a novel challenge to standard understandings of responsibility practices, an...
This chapter focuses on the relationship between liability in (criminal) law, responsibility, and re...
This article identifies a novel challenge to standard understandings of responsibility practices, an...
This paper tries to develop an epistemological analysis on the notion of responsibility. After point...
This article is concerned with the conflict between two theories of moral responsibility for wrongdo...
This article is concerned with the conflict between two theories of moral responsibility for wrongdo...
This article is concerned with the conflict between two theories of moral responsibility for wrongdo...
This article is concerned with the conflict between two theories of moral responsibility for wrongdo...
Responsibility is impossible because there is no responsibility-maker and there needs to be one if p...
Responsibility is impossible because there is no responsibility-maker and there needs to be one if p...
Responsibility is impossible because there is no responsibility-maker and there needs to be one if p...
This chapter focuses on the relationship between liability in (criminal) law, responsibility, and re...
[Note: articles 1-5 are in English; Intro, Discussion, and Conclusion are in Portuguese.] Responsibi...
[Note: articles 1-5 are in English; Intro, Discussion, and Conclusion are in Portuguese.] Responsibi...
This article identifies a novel challenge to standard understandings of responsibility practices, an...
This article identifies a novel challenge to standard understandings of responsibility practices, an...
This chapter focuses on the relationship between liability in (criminal) law, responsibility, and re...
This article identifies a novel challenge to standard understandings of responsibility practices, an...
This paper tries to develop an epistemological analysis on the notion of responsibility. After point...