This is the third installment in a series of articles examining the famous twenty eight pairs of dueling canons left to us in 1950 by Karl N. Llewellyn ( Remarks on the Theory of Appellate Decision and the rules or Canons of about how Statutes are to be Construed, 3 VANDERBILT L.REV. 395 (1950). In the first two installments, examining Pairs 1 through 12, Llewellyn\u27s fiendish deconstruction of these twenty-four canons proved quite innocuous. This installment covers pairs 13 to 16. Once again, looking at the reasons underlying the canons in each pair and the appropriate context for their use completely dissolves the superficial contrariety, Llewellyn\u27s oppositions appearing artificial and contrived. And once again one is often for...
In resolving questions of statutory meaning, the lion’s share of Roberts Court opinions considers an...
This Article demonstrates that textualist Judges, most notably Justices Scalia, Thomas, and, to a le...
The purpose of this paper is to explore what, if anything, Congress should do about the canons of st...
In this, the second installment in a series of articles planned to examine each of the twenty eight ...
This is the third installment in a series of articles examining the famous twenty eight pairs of du...
This Article offers the first targeted study of the Supreme Court’s use of canons and other tools of...
This Symposium has its genesis in the Vanderbilt Law Review\u27s inaugural symposium, A Symposium on...
A regrettable side-effect of Karl Llewellyn\u27s interesting critique of the canons of statutory con...
Over forty years ago, in the Symposium we commemorate today, Professor Karl Llewellyn wrote a devast...
The human spirit can be deeply stirred by art for its own sake, but there is special magic when the ...
Canons are taking their turn down the academic runway in ways that no one would have foretold just a...
In one of the most celebrated law review articles of all time, Karl Llewellyn argued that the tradit...
This paper provides the first empirical study of the Roberts Court’s use of substantive canons in it...
The canons of construction are a set of formalized rules or maxims for interpreting words. These c...
Karl Llewellyn\u27s classic article on the canons of statutory construction, which we rightly celebr...
In resolving questions of statutory meaning, the lion’s share of Roberts Court opinions considers an...
This Article demonstrates that textualist Judges, most notably Justices Scalia, Thomas, and, to a le...
The purpose of this paper is to explore what, if anything, Congress should do about the canons of st...
In this, the second installment in a series of articles planned to examine each of the twenty eight ...
This is the third installment in a series of articles examining the famous twenty eight pairs of du...
This Article offers the first targeted study of the Supreme Court’s use of canons and other tools of...
This Symposium has its genesis in the Vanderbilt Law Review\u27s inaugural symposium, A Symposium on...
A regrettable side-effect of Karl Llewellyn\u27s interesting critique of the canons of statutory con...
Over forty years ago, in the Symposium we commemorate today, Professor Karl Llewellyn wrote a devast...
The human spirit can be deeply stirred by art for its own sake, but there is special magic when the ...
Canons are taking their turn down the academic runway in ways that no one would have foretold just a...
In one of the most celebrated law review articles of all time, Karl Llewellyn argued that the tradit...
This paper provides the first empirical study of the Roberts Court’s use of substantive canons in it...
The canons of construction are a set of formalized rules or maxims for interpreting words. These c...
Karl Llewellyn\u27s classic article on the canons of statutory construction, which we rightly celebr...
In resolving questions of statutory meaning, the lion’s share of Roberts Court opinions considers an...
This Article demonstrates that textualist Judges, most notably Justices Scalia, Thomas, and, to a le...
The purpose of this paper is to explore what, if anything, Congress should do about the canons of st...