The Supreme Court is not the institution that I once revered, writes Erwin Chemerinsky in The Case Against the Supreme Court-a provocative, important work that also happens to be a great read. Chemerinsky\u27s claim is that the Supreme Court ought to be protecting vulnerable minorities from repressive majorities, but it has not done so. The Court has frequently failed, throughout American history, at its most important tasks, at its most important moments, he argues.\u27 This is Chemerinsky\u27s case against the Supreme Court, and it is a sweeping indictment. Of the cases Chemerinsky cites to prove his point, three stand out as particularly strong examples of the Supreme Court\u27s failure to protect: Plessy v. Ferguson,4 Buck v. Bell,5 ...
In the last decade, it has become increasingly trendy to question whether the Supreme Court and cons...
The subway fare in New York City was recently raised to thirty cents. Incensed citizens immediately ...
This article chronicles the Supreme Court\u27s expansion of the “culture of irresponsibility,” where...
Plessy v. Ferguson. Buck v. Bell. Korematsu v. United States. Together, these three decisions legiti...
It is a pleasure and a privilege to write an introduction to this Symposium celebrating Dean Erwin C...
Sanford Levinson calls for a new constitutional convention in Our Undemocratic Constitution: Where t...
Erwin Chemerinsky is broken hearted. Almost forty years ago, he writes, I decided to go to law sc...
The Supreme Court often has failed at its most important tasks and at the most important times. I se...
The recent growth in the importance and apparent power of the Supreme Court has been one result of o...
This Article suggests that the U.S. Supreme Court, through its decisions in cases alleging race disc...
Article III is odd. In contrast to Articles 12 and II, which specify in some detail how the legislat...
Is it possible to decide whether a constitutional decision is right or wrong? Legal scholars respond...
This essay, which was prepared for a symposium issue in recognition of the twentieth anniversary of ...
The author explains his conclusion that the Supreme Court, as a matter of conscience, considers raci...
For decades, the justices themselves undermined the honor which ought to be afforded the third branc...
In the last decade, it has become increasingly trendy to question whether the Supreme Court and cons...
The subway fare in New York City was recently raised to thirty cents. Incensed citizens immediately ...
This article chronicles the Supreme Court\u27s expansion of the “culture of irresponsibility,” where...
Plessy v. Ferguson. Buck v. Bell. Korematsu v. United States. Together, these three decisions legiti...
It is a pleasure and a privilege to write an introduction to this Symposium celebrating Dean Erwin C...
Sanford Levinson calls for a new constitutional convention in Our Undemocratic Constitution: Where t...
Erwin Chemerinsky is broken hearted. Almost forty years ago, he writes, I decided to go to law sc...
The Supreme Court often has failed at its most important tasks and at the most important times. I se...
The recent growth in the importance and apparent power of the Supreme Court has been one result of o...
This Article suggests that the U.S. Supreme Court, through its decisions in cases alleging race disc...
Article III is odd. In contrast to Articles 12 and II, which specify in some detail how the legislat...
Is it possible to decide whether a constitutional decision is right or wrong? Legal scholars respond...
This essay, which was prepared for a symposium issue in recognition of the twentieth anniversary of ...
The author explains his conclusion that the Supreme Court, as a matter of conscience, considers raci...
For decades, the justices themselves undermined the honor which ought to be afforded the third branc...
In the last decade, it has become increasingly trendy to question whether the Supreme Court and cons...
The subway fare in New York City was recently raised to thirty cents. Incensed citizens immediately ...
This article chronicles the Supreme Court\u27s expansion of the “culture of irresponsibility,” where...