There were many questionable business methods which could be used by advisers prior to the passage of the Act. In 1939, it was not uncommon for an adviser to arrange that one client buy a certain security and that another sell the same one. Where the adviser operated on the then commonly accepted basis of receiving a proportion of profits made by his clients, he could not lose by using this technique. The adviser\u27s sole concern was to seek new clients to replace those whose assets or credulity were exhausted. Adviser custody of clients\u27 funds was the basis of most deceptive practices. Instead of buying and selling in the interest of the client there was frequently a shifting of high quality securities to the adviser\u27s personal acco...
Under our securities regime, investment advisers are considered to be fiduciaries, whereas broker-de...
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC or Commission) appears to be on the verge of requiring i...
The duty of prudence enunciated by the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts in 1830 in Amory v. H...
The Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (“IAA”) and its regulatory purview have changed dramatically ove...
In the landmark decision of SEC v. Capital Gains Research Bureau, Inc., the United States Supreme Co...
The article argues that a better approach for hedge fund regulation in the U.S. would be for law to ...
This Article argues that, from both theoretical and pragmatic perspectives, a better approach would ...
Seventy-five years after its enactment the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 has advanced from a relat...
The Investment Company Act of 1940 (ICA) and the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (IAA) prevent an in...
(Excerpt) In order to set the stage for the discussion of this Article’s proposal, this Article firs...
ENGLISH: This article analyzes judicial approaches to interpreting the definition of an investment a...
This article contends that even with the inconsistent regulatory and statutory framework governing f...
In light of the recent scandals in the mutual fund area, advisers that experience loss of investors\...
This Article contends that more effective regulation of investment advisers could be achieved by rec...
More than 100 million Americans invest $25 trillion in mutual funds and exchange-traded funds (colle...
Under our securities regime, investment advisers are considered to be fiduciaries, whereas broker-de...
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC or Commission) appears to be on the verge of requiring i...
The duty of prudence enunciated by the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts in 1830 in Amory v. H...
The Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (“IAA”) and its regulatory purview have changed dramatically ove...
In the landmark decision of SEC v. Capital Gains Research Bureau, Inc., the United States Supreme Co...
The article argues that a better approach for hedge fund regulation in the U.S. would be for law to ...
This Article argues that, from both theoretical and pragmatic perspectives, a better approach would ...
Seventy-five years after its enactment the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 has advanced from a relat...
The Investment Company Act of 1940 (ICA) and the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (IAA) prevent an in...
(Excerpt) In order to set the stage for the discussion of this Article’s proposal, this Article firs...
ENGLISH: This article analyzes judicial approaches to interpreting the definition of an investment a...
This article contends that even with the inconsistent regulatory and statutory framework governing f...
In light of the recent scandals in the mutual fund area, advisers that experience loss of investors\...
This Article contends that more effective regulation of investment advisers could be achieved by rec...
More than 100 million Americans invest $25 trillion in mutual funds and exchange-traded funds (colle...
Under our securities regime, investment advisers are considered to be fiduciaries, whereas broker-de...
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC or Commission) appears to be on the verge of requiring i...
The duty of prudence enunciated by the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts in 1830 in Amory v. H...