Add to ORKGThis Article presents both historical and empirical evidence to support the view that the Supreme Court and the lower federal courts are inferior forums for resolving insurance-related controversies. It is amply apparent that "inferior" is an appropriate description of federal courts that have tried to harmonize federal antitrust, insolvency, and "superpriority" statutes with key sections of the McCarran-Ferguson Act
For over a century, there has been a continuing controversy concerning state versus federal regulati...
During the period from June 2002 to July 2003, the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit decided tw...
On March 22, 1988, the Attorneys General of eight states filed antitrust actions in state and federa...
The movement to reform the McCarran-Ferguson Act is misplaced. The Supreme Court and the lower feder...
This Article presents both historical and empirical evidence to support the view that the Supreme Co...
Among America\u27s financial institutions, insurance firms alone are largely immune from federal reg...
This article was presented at a symposium entitled “Public and Private: Are the Boundaries in Tran...
Since 1945 Congress has exempted certain activities of insurance companies from federal antitrust sc...
The 1945 McCarran-Ferguson Act provides that federal legislation generally, including the antitrust ...
Any substantial inquiry into the functioning of the insurance commissioner in American society poses...
Correspondence issued by the Government Accountability Office with an abstract that begins "This let...
The social significance of the insurance antitrust suits extends beyond the specific legal issues of...
The McCarran-Ferguson Act was enacted in 1945 to safeguard the rights of the states to regulate the ...
State insurance regulation may be broadly divided into two categories. The first generally encompass...
So for more than six decades, the insurance industry has operated largely beyond the reach of federa...
For over a century, there has been a continuing controversy concerning state versus federal regulati...
During the period from June 2002 to July 2003, the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit decided tw...
On March 22, 1988, the Attorneys General of eight states filed antitrust actions in state and federa...
The movement to reform the McCarran-Ferguson Act is misplaced. The Supreme Court and the lower feder...
This Article presents both historical and empirical evidence to support the view that the Supreme Co...
Among America\u27s financial institutions, insurance firms alone are largely immune from federal reg...
This article was presented at a symposium entitled “Public and Private: Are the Boundaries in Tran...
Since 1945 Congress has exempted certain activities of insurance companies from federal antitrust sc...
The 1945 McCarran-Ferguson Act provides that federal legislation generally, including the antitrust ...
Any substantial inquiry into the functioning of the insurance commissioner in American society poses...
Correspondence issued by the Government Accountability Office with an abstract that begins "This let...
The social significance of the insurance antitrust suits extends beyond the specific legal issues of...
The McCarran-Ferguson Act was enacted in 1945 to safeguard the rights of the states to regulate the ...
State insurance regulation may be broadly divided into two categories. The first generally encompass...
So for more than six decades, the insurance industry has operated largely beyond the reach of federa...
For over a century, there has been a continuing controversy concerning state versus federal regulati...
During the period from June 2002 to July 2003, the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit decided tw...
On March 22, 1988, the Attorneys General of eight states filed antitrust actions in state and federa...