Some years ago, caselaw on trademark parodies and similar unauthorized “speech” uses of trademarks could have led one to conclude that the law had no sense of humor. Over time, however, courts in the US and elsewhere began to leaven likelihood of confusion analyses with healthy skepticism regarding consumers’ alleged inability to perceive a joke. These decisions did not always expressly cite the copyright fair use defense, but the considerations underlying the copyright doctrine seemed to inform trademark analysis as well. The spillover effect may indeed have been inevitable, as several of the cases in which the fair use defense prevailed coupled copyright and trademark claims. Just as copyright law has influenced the development of tradema...
Mickey Mouse is one of the most recognizable characters in the world, but this famous character will...
In this chapter, we address the phenomenon of overlapping trademark and copyright protection under U...
In this article the author responds to James Gibson’s article Risk Aversion and Rights Accretion in ...
Some years ago, caselaw on trademark parodies and similar unauthorized “speech” uses of trademarks c...
In Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. Justice Scalia colorfully warned against resort ...
This chapter addresses the phenomenon of overlapping rights under US law and complements Chapter 25 ...
In this Article, I tackle a controversial topic-the overlapping trademark and copyright protection t...
Copyright and trademarks often overlap, particularly in visual characters. The same figure may quali...
Should extant or expired copyright or patent designs (such as those featuring Mickey Mouse, Wonder W...
Artists and other creators of expressive works often include trademarks and trademarked products as ...
In this Intellectual Property Viewpoints series, we tend to focus on copyright and patent law – the ...
This Article explores the copyright and trademark laws underlying Disney’s characters in light of Mi...
Parodies have long provided many of us with amusement, entertainment,and sometimes even information....
The Ninth Circuit temporarily stunned marketers in 2011 when it ruled that Betty Boop did not serve ...
Fictional characters have become exceptionally valuable assets, now consistently the subject of lucr...
Mickey Mouse is one of the most recognizable characters in the world, but this famous character will...
In this chapter, we address the phenomenon of overlapping trademark and copyright protection under U...
In this article the author responds to James Gibson’s article Risk Aversion and Rights Accretion in ...
Some years ago, caselaw on trademark parodies and similar unauthorized “speech” uses of trademarks c...
In Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. Justice Scalia colorfully warned against resort ...
This chapter addresses the phenomenon of overlapping rights under US law and complements Chapter 25 ...
In this Article, I tackle a controversial topic-the overlapping trademark and copyright protection t...
Copyright and trademarks often overlap, particularly in visual characters. The same figure may quali...
Should extant or expired copyright or patent designs (such as those featuring Mickey Mouse, Wonder W...
Artists and other creators of expressive works often include trademarks and trademarked products as ...
In this Intellectual Property Viewpoints series, we tend to focus on copyright and patent law – the ...
This Article explores the copyright and trademark laws underlying Disney’s characters in light of Mi...
Parodies have long provided many of us with amusement, entertainment,and sometimes even information....
The Ninth Circuit temporarily stunned marketers in 2011 when it ruled that Betty Boop did not serve ...
Fictional characters have become exceptionally valuable assets, now consistently the subject of lucr...
Mickey Mouse is one of the most recognizable characters in the world, but this famous character will...
In this chapter, we address the phenomenon of overlapping trademark and copyright protection under U...
In this article the author responds to James Gibson’s article Risk Aversion and Rights Accretion in ...