Ever since 1827, the U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly observed that when a court is interpreting a statute that falls within the authority of an administrative agency, the court in reaching its own judgment about the statute\u27s meaning should give substantial weight to the agency\u27s view. Repeated again and again over the years in varying formulations, this proposition found its apotheosis in Skidmore v. Swift & Co., a unanimous opinion authored by Justice Jackson in 1944. His opinion took the proposition to be so obvious that no citation was required. Justice Jackson\u27s typically incisive and memorable formulation stuck. It found its way into administrative law casebooks – also without reference to its many predecessors. It has sinc...
After nearly thirty years, the judicially crafted Chevron and Skidmore judicial-review doctrines hav...
Because the Constitution is the foundation of American government, the political body that interpret...
Since the Supreme Court’s 1984 decision in Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council, this judici...
In a coup en banc, Justice Scalia appears to have converted his lonely and furious dissent from Unit...
This Article offers a comprehensive examination of the Skidmore standard for judicial review of agen...
This Article addresses critically the implications of the U.S. Supreme Court\u27s recent decision in...
This Article addresses critically the implications of the U.S. Supreme Court\u27s recent decision in...
This Essay suggests an underappreciated, appropriate, and conceptually coherent structure to the Che...
This Essay suggests an underappreciated, appropriate, and conceptually coherent structure to the Che...
This Article addresses the question of how a court can justify deferring to an administrative agency...
The Supreme Court\u27s decision in Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Counsel, Inc. dr...
The Supreme Court’s willingness to defer to agency interpretations of ambiguous statutes has vacilla...
In Lechmere, Inc. v. NLRB, the Supreme Court held that when interpreting administrative statutes, th...
With three recent decisions—Utility Air Regulatory Group v. EPA, King v. Burwell, and Michigan v. EP...
In 1984, the Supreme Court adopted a new framework for determining when courts should defer to inter...
After nearly thirty years, the judicially crafted Chevron and Skidmore judicial-review doctrines hav...
Because the Constitution is the foundation of American government, the political body that interpret...
Since the Supreme Court’s 1984 decision in Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council, this judici...
In a coup en banc, Justice Scalia appears to have converted his lonely and furious dissent from Unit...
This Article offers a comprehensive examination of the Skidmore standard for judicial review of agen...
This Article addresses critically the implications of the U.S. Supreme Court\u27s recent decision in...
This Article addresses critically the implications of the U.S. Supreme Court\u27s recent decision in...
This Essay suggests an underappreciated, appropriate, and conceptually coherent structure to the Che...
This Essay suggests an underappreciated, appropriate, and conceptually coherent structure to the Che...
This Article addresses the question of how a court can justify deferring to an administrative agency...
The Supreme Court\u27s decision in Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Counsel, Inc. dr...
The Supreme Court’s willingness to defer to agency interpretations of ambiguous statutes has vacilla...
In Lechmere, Inc. v. NLRB, the Supreme Court held that when interpreting administrative statutes, th...
With three recent decisions—Utility Air Regulatory Group v. EPA, King v. Burwell, and Michigan v. EP...
In 1984, the Supreme Court adopted a new framework for determining when courts should defer to inter...
After nearly thirty years, the judicially crafted Chevron and Skidmore judicial-review doctrines hav...
Because the Constitution is the foundation of American government, the political body that interpret...
Since the Supreme Court’s 1984 decision in Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council, this judici...