This Note documents the evolution of the mosaic theory in Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) national security law and highlights its centrality in the post-9/11 landscape of information control. After years of doctrinal stasis and practical anonymity, federal agencies began asserting the theory more aggressively after 9/11, thereby testing the limits of executive secrecy and of judicial deference. Though essentially valid, the mosaic theory has been applied in ways that are unfalsifiable, in tension with the text and purpose of FOIA, and susceptible to abuse and overbreadth. This Note therefore argues, against precedent, for greater judicial scrutiny of mosaic theory claims
This essay urges reexamination of the privacy implications of registration and community notificatio...
In the Supreme Court\u27s recent decision on GPS surveillance, United States v. Jones, five justices...
This Note proposes that the mosaic theory is an unlawful method of securities analysis constituting ...
This Note documents the evolution of the mosaic theory in Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) nation...
This article explores the use of the concept of mosaics in individual rights litigation, a topic t...
This article examines the tension between sensitive national security information and transparency i...
In CIA v. Sims, the United States Supreme Court held that the CIA could withhold information about c...
The article discusses the inapplicability of the mosaic theory of the Fourth Amendment, which declar...
This Article explores the use of the concept of “mosaics” in individual rights litigation, a topic t...
The mosaic theory of the Fourth Amendment holds that, when it comes to people’s reasonable expectati...
The mosaic theory — first articulated by the Supreme Court in United States v. Jones two years ago —...
In the Supreme Court\u27s recent decision in United States v. Jones, a majority of the Justices appe...
Antoine Jones, who was the owner of a nightclub in the District of Columbia called “Levels,” was con...
On January 23, 2012, the Supreme Court issued a landmark non-decision in United States v. Jones. In ...
This essay urges reexamination of the privacy implications of registration and community notificatio...
In the Supreme Court\u27s recent decision on GPS surveillance, United States v. Jones, five justices...
This Note proposes that the mosaic theory is an unlawful method of securities analysis constituting ...
This Note documents the evolution of the mosaic theory in Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) nation...
This article explores the use of the concept of mosaics in individual rights litigation, a topic t...
This article examines the tension between sensitive national security information and transparency i...
In CIA v. Sims, the United States Supreme Court held that the CIA could withhold information about c...
The article discusses the inapplicability of the mosaic theory of the Fourth Amendment, which declar...
This Article explores the use of the concept of “mosaics” in individual rights litigation, a topic t...
The mosaic theory of the Fourth Amendment holds that, when it comes to people’s reasonable expectati...
The mosaic theory — first articulated by the Supreme Court in United States v. Jones two years ago —...
In the Supreme Court\u27s recent decision in United States v. Jones, a majority of the Justices appe...
Antoine Jones, who was the owner of a nightclub in the District of Columbia called “Levels,” was con...
On January 23, 2012, the Supreme Court issued a landmark non-decision in United States v. Jones. In ...
This essay urges reexamination of the privacy implications of registration and community notificatio...
In the Supreme Court\u27s recent decision on GPS surveillance, United States v. Jones, five justices...
This Note proposes that the mosaic theory is an unlawful method of securities analysis constituting ...