The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure contain express instructions regarding the discoverability of expert witnesses. The Rules, however, lack any specific guidelines regarding the discoverability of the identity of nontestifying experts, indicating only that such discovery can be obtained upon a proper showing. The various circuit courts of appeal that have considered the meaning of this phrase have arrived at contrary positions concerning its meaning. Thus, although this information is often valuable or even critical to the preparation of a lawsuit, no uniform guidelines presently exist by which courts and parties can determine whether the identity of nontestifying experts can or should be allowed. This Note addresses the problem of iden...
Traditionally, except for the limited role played by pleadings and bills of particulars, the attorne...
The Daubert case encourages judges to ask whether forensic identification expertise is valid, not me...
In a products liability action the plaintiff\u27s attorney engages an expert witness to testify at t...
The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure contain express instructions regarding the discoverability of e...
This Note proposes an approach to the problem of identification of rule 26(b)(4)(B) experts that dif...
The system of discovery that the Federal Rules establish theoretically entitles all parties in civil...
When an attorney furnishes documents containing work product to an expert witness, a potential confl...
With the adoption of extensive pretrial discovery mechanisms, preparation for trial in the federal s...
This article will focus on whether the hiring of the free agent as a non-trial expert, in order to c...
The problem of delineating the boundaries of discovery under Rules 26-37 of the Federal Rules of Civ...
Courts have fashioned various common law standards to determine the admissibility of nonscientific e...
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(A)(2) governs disclosure of expert testimony. The rule purports t...
In this Article, Professor Underwood discusses the varying application of Rule 615 of the Federal Ru...
The typical requisites for receiving testimony from an expert witness are that the expert be qualifi...
In civil litigation, the big business of retaining experts has raised concerns about the integrity o...
Traditionally, except for the limited role played by pleadings and bills of particulars, the attorne...
The Daubert case encourages judges to ask whether forensic identification expertise is valid, not me...
In a products liability action the plaintiff\u27s attorney engages an expert witness to testify at t...
The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure contain express instructions regarding the discoverability of e...
This Note proposes an approach to the problem of identification of rule 26(b)(4)(B) experts that dif...
The system of discovery that the Federal Rules establish theoretically entitles all parties in civil...
When an attorney furnishes documents containing work product to an expert witness, a potential confl...
With the adoption of extensive pretrial discovery mechanisms, preparation for trial in the federal s...
This article will focus on whether the hiring of the free agent as a non-trial expert, in order to c...
The problem of delineating the boundaries of discovery under Rules 26-37 of the Federal Rules of Civ...
Courts have fashioned various common law standards to determine the admissibility of nonscientific e...
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(A)(2) governs disclosure of expert testimony. The rule purports t...
In this Article, Professor Underwood discusses the varying application of Rule 615 of the Federal Ru...
The typical requisites for receiving testimony from an expert witness are that the expert be qualifi...
In civil litigation, the big business of retaining experts has raised concerns about the integrity o...
Traditionally, except for the limited role played by pleadings and bills of particulars, the attorne...
The Daubert case encourages judges to ask whether forensic identification expertise is valid, not me...
In a products liability action the plaintiff\u27s attorney engages an expert witness to testify at t...