Add to ORKGIn Younger v. Harris, the Supreme Court declined to interfere in a state criminal prosecution by enjoining state proceedings based on a probably invalid statute. This deference reflects the Court\u27s continuing effort to coordinate duplicative or potentially duplicative litigation. Coordination of duplicative litigation, however, has been developed in many contexts other than the protection of federal civil rights against state action. This Article examines the historical development of equitable intervention doctrines and discusses the tension between coordinating duplicative litigation and protecting state sovereignty. The Article concludes that federal relief should be denied when it may duplicate the work of state courts and is unlikel...
Among the most significant decisions of the Supreme Court over the past decade have been those limit...
The doctrine of Younger abstention—which counsels federal courts not to interrupt ongoing state crim...
This Commentary argues that the Court decided New York v. United States incorrectly. The Court faile...
In Younger v. Harris, the Supreme Court declined to interfere in a state criminal prosecution by enj...
In Younger v. Harris, the Supreme Court declined to interfere in a state criminal prosecution by enj...
In Younger v. Harris, the Supreme Court declined to interfere in a state criminal prosecution by enj...
The recent United States Supreme Court decision of Younger v. Harris along with its companion cases ...
The Supreme Court in its 1971 decision of Younger v. Harris prohibited federal court intervention in...
The Supreme Court in its 1971 decision of Younger v. Harris prohibited federal court intervention in...
For decades federal courts have remained mostly off limits to civil rights cases challenging the con...
Recently the Supreme Court extended the doctrine of Younger v. Harris to preclude federal court refo...
Recently the Supreme Court extended the doctrine of Younger v. Harris to preclude federal court refo...
The Younger abstention doctrine limits the ability of a federal court to enjoin a pending state proc...
The abstention doctrines have received much attention by the United States Supreme Court over the la...
The Supreme Court in its 1971 decision of Younger v. Harris prohibited federal court intervention in...
Among the most significant decisions of the Supreme Court over the past decade have been those limit...
The doctrine of Younger abstention—which counsels federal courts not to interrupt ongoing state crim...
This Commentary argues that the Court decided New York v. United States incorrectly. The Court faile...
In Younger v. Harris, the Supreme Court declined to interfere in a state criminal prosecution by enj...
In Younger v. Harris, the Supreme Court declined to interfere in a state criminal prosecution by enj...
In Younger v. Harris, the Supreme Court declined to interfere in a state criminal prosecution by enj...
The recent United States Supreme Court decision of Younger v. Harris along with its companion cases ...
The Supreme Court in its 1971 decision of Younger v. Harris prohibited federal court intervention in...
The Supreme Court in its 1971 decision of Younger v. Harris prohibited federal court intervention in...
For decades federal courts have remained mostly off limits to civil rights cases challenging the con...
Recently the Supreme Court extended the doctrine of Younger v. Harris to preclude federal court refo...
Recently the Supreme Court extended the doctrine of Younger v. Harris to preclude federal court refo...
The Younger abstention doctrine limits the ability of a federal court to enjoin a pending state proc...
The abstention doctrines have received much attention by the United States Supreme Court over the la...
The Supreme Court in its 1971 decision of Younger v. Harris prohibited federal court intervention in...
Among the most significant decisions of the Supreme Court over the past decade have been those limit...
The doctrine of Younger abstention—which counsels federal courts not to interrupt ongoing state crim...
This Commentary argues that the Court decided New York v. United States incorrectly. The Court faile...