Add to ORKGThe Article examines the comparative-impairment theory adopted by the California Supreme Court in Bernhard v. Harrah\u27s Club. Comparative-impairment, the author argues, is so imprecise and manipulable as to be largely indistinguishable from a search for better law. Furthermore, the doctrine of comparative-impairment raises the serious jurisprudential and philosophical questions associated with natural law
This article is from the lecture series, Problems in Comparative Law, delivered at the Indiana Unive...
This article focuses on the distinctions that the ad hoc Tribunals have drawn between the comparativ...
The focus of this article is the issue of integrating statutory and other law. A substantial number ...
The Article examines the comparative-impairment theory adopted by the California Supreme Court in Be...
In his 1963 article in the Stanford Law Review, Choice of Law and the Federal System, Professor Wi...
In his 1963 article in the Stanford Law Review, “Choice of Law and the Federal System,” Professor Wi...
When the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Roper v. Simmons, a longstanding debate about com...
The debate over the proper analytical approach to choiceof- law problems continues among American le...
Courts in Europe, North America and elsewhere frequently use the language of balancing when dealin...
The article discusses what types of legal cases constitute a “canon” on American constitutional theo...
Preprint of an article by Paul Norman, former Reference and Online Services Librarian at the Institu...
This article is a first step in an effort to critically examine - and to debunk - some of the myths ...
This Article argues that both camps fail to adequately grapple with how courts facilitate or erode t...
This article by Basil Markesinis and Jorg Fedtke may be a turning point. It will encourage generatio...
The explosion of scholarship in comparative constitutional law in the last decade tends to overshado...
This article is from the lecture series, Problems in Comparative Law, delivered at the Indiana Unive...
This article focuses on the distinctions that the ad hoc Tribunals have drawn between the comparativ...
The focus of this article is the issue of integrating statutory and other law. A substantial number ...
The Article examines the comparative-impairment theory adopted by the California Supreme Court in Be...
In his 1963 article in the Stanford Law Review, Choice of Law and the Federal System, Professor Wi...
In his 1963 article in the Stanford Law Review, “Choice of Law and the Federal System,” Professor Wi...
When the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Roper v. Simmons, a longstanding debate about com...
The debate over the proper analytical approach to choiceof- law problems continues among American le...
Courts in Europe, North America and elsewhere frequently use the language of balancing when dealin...
The article discusses what types of legal cases constitute a “canon” on American constitutional theo...
Preprint of an article by Paul Norman, former Reference and Online Services Librarian at the Institu...
This article is a first step in an effort to critically examine - and to debunk - some of the myths ...
This Article argues that both camps fail to adequately grapple with how courts facilitate or erode t...
This article by Basil Markesinis and Jorg Fedtke may be a turning point. It will encourage generatio...
The explosion of scholarship in comparative constitutional law in the last decade tends to overshado...
This article is from the lecture series, Problems in Comparative Law, delivered at the Indiana Unive...
This article focuses on the distinctions that the ad hoc Tribunals have drawn between the comparativ...
The focus of this article is the issue of integrating statutory and other law. A substantial number ...