In Feres v. United States, military personnel were denied the right to sue the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act for injuries sustained incident to military service. A case recently decided by the United States Supreme Court, Stencel Aero Engineering Corporation v. United States, expanded the scope of the Feres Doctrine to include third party government contractors and suppliers seeking indemnity from the United States on claims by active-duty service personnel. This Note examines the recent Stencel decision and considers the effect of this decision upon the indemnity claims of private parties sued as joint tortfeasors with the government
Through the application of the judicially created Feres doctrine, female service members who suffer ...
In 1946, the ancient wall of sovereign immunity gave way with the passage of the Federal Tort Claims...
Federal courts treat military mothers and their children differently from male military members and ...
In Feres v. United States, military personnel were denied the right to sue the United States under t...
This Note reevaluates the Feres doctrine in light of legal developments of the past three decades. I...
The United States Government traditionally has enjoyed sovereign immunity from tort liability. In 19...
In Feres v. United States, the Supreme Court barred service members from suing the Government under ...
Absent any clear legislative history, the Supreme Court concluded in Feres that Congress had not int...
The Supreme Court’s 1950 Feres v. United States decision held that when it enacted the Federal Tort ...
In Boyle v. United Technologies Corp., the United States Supreme Court held military contractors who...
Great Britain recently eliminated the military exception to the Crown Proceedings Act of 1947. The U...
The United States Supreme Court held that the federal government cannot be liable in contract for br...
The background and history of the Federal Tort Claims Act are well known. Stemming in part from the...
Sixty-seven years ago, Feres v. United States foreclosed service members from pursuing claims under ...
An automobile containing two furloughed soldiers and their father was struck by a negligently operat...
Through the application of the judicially created Feres doctrine, female service members who suffer ...
In 1946, the ancient wall of sovereign immunity gave way with the passage of the Federal Tort Claims...
Federal courts treat military mothers and their children differently from male military members and ...
In Feres v. United States, military personnel were denied the right to sue the United States under t...
This Note reevaluates the Feres doctrine in light of legal developments of the past three decades. I...
The United States Government traditionally has enjoyed sovereign immunity from tort liability. In 19...
In Feres v. United States, the Supreme Court barred service members from suing the Government under ...
Absent any clear legislative history, the Supreme Court concluded in Feres that Congress had not int...
The Supreme Court’s 1950 Feres v. United States decision held that when it enacted the Federal Tort ...
In Boyle v. United Technologies Corp., the United States Supreme Court held military contractors who...
Great Britain recently eliminated the military exception to the Crown Proceedings Act of 1947. The U...
The United States Supreme Court held that the federal government cannot be liable in contract for br...
The background and history of the Federal Tort Claims Act are well known. Stemming in part from the...
Sixty-seven years ago, Feres v. United States foreclosed service members from pursuing claims under ...
An automobile containing two furloughed soldiers and their father was struck by a negligently operat...
Through the application of the judicially created Feres doctrine, female service members who suffer ...
In 1946, the ancient wall of sovereign immunity gave way with the passage of the Federal Tort Claims...
Federal courts treat military mothers and their children differently from male military members and ...