Many employers require employees to agree to contractual provisions restricting postemployment disclosure of trade secret information. These contracts, however, are often drafted so as to include information not properly within the scope of trade secret protection. The author examines this problem and, \u27after concluding that current judicial treatment is inadequate to protect the interests of employees and the public, suggests an antitrust remedy
[In Maggbury v Hafele, the High Court of Australia had to consider whether a perpetual restraint of ...
This article assesses the impact of legal practice upon the enforceability of employment restraints ...
Because of the great part that such trade secrets play in the success of many industrial endeavors, ...
Many employers require employees to agree to contractual provisions restricting postemployment discl...
The book covers the protection of trade secrets and the law on post-contractualnon-compete clauses (...
Restrictive covenants or non-compete clauses are commonly used in employment contracts to prevent un...
Employees are increasingly mobile across state lines. This is partly the result of technological cha...
Businesses increasingly rely on employee non-compete agreements to protect their assets and forestal...
Non-competition covenants operate as a type of intellectual property regulation-somewhat akin to tra...
To prevent former employees from utilizing a business ’ trade secrets or other proprietary informati...
The California courts frequently have determined the rights of parties to trade secrets disclosed by...
This note will discuss the Seventh Circuit\u27s analysis and the potential impact of the PepsiCo dec...
Trade secret defendants sometimes raise First Amendment defenses to trade secret misappropriation cl...
Critics of the inevitable disclosure doctrine decry the inconsistency with which courts rule on thes...
Abstract: In a competitive global marketplace, companies are relentless in their search for the best...
[In Maggbury v Hafele, the High Court of Australia had to consider whether a perpetual restraint of ...
This article assesses the impact of legal practice upon the enforceability of employment restraints ...
Because of the great part that such trade secrets play in the success of many industrial endeavors, ...
Many employers require employees to agree to contractual provisions restricting postemployment discl...
The book covers the protection of trade secrets and the law on post-contractualnon-compete clauses (...
Restrictive covenants or non-compete clauses are commonly used in employment contracts to prevent un...
Employees are increasingly mobile across state lines. This is partly the result of technological cha...
Businesses increasingly rely on employee non-compete agreements to protect their assets and forestal...
Non-competition covenants operate as a type of intellectual property regulation-somewhat akin to tra...
To prevent former employees from utilizing a business ’ trade secrets or other proprietary informati...
The California courts frequently have determined the rights of parties to trade secrets disclosed by...
This note will discuss the Seventh Circuit\u27s analysis and the potential impact of the PepsiCo dec...
Trade secret defendants sometimes raise First Amendment defenses to trade secret misappropriation cl...
Critics of the inevitable disclosure doctrine decry the inconsistency with which courts rule on thes...
Abstract: In a competitive global marketplace, companies are relentless in their search for the best...
[In Maggbury v Hafele, the High Court of Australia had to consider whether a perpetual restraint of ...
This article assesses the impact of legal practice upon the enforceability of employment restraints ...
Because of the great part that such trade secrets play in the success of many industrial endeavors, ...