Sixty years ago, the United States and Great Britain spearheaded efforts to create a new world order based on international rules. Today these same two nations are leading the charge to abandon many of the global safeguards they once fought to establish. The Bush Administration has decided to turn its back on international agreements governing basic human rights, war, torture, and the environment. In this transcript from the Schlesinger Lecture held in November 2005, Professor Sands discusses how international rules are arbitrarily applied as human rights prove to be inconvenient in the face of globalizing economic forces
On September 6, 2006, President George W. Bush declared that the so-called “enhanced interrogation t...
This Article is devoted to the question of the future relevance of international law at a time when ...
The decision, in 2003, by the United States and the United Kingdom to go to war against Iraq was see...
Sixty years ago, the United States and Great Britain spearheaded efforts to create a new world order...
Philippe Sands (Penguin Books, London 2006) Paperback, Pp 432, ISBN 9780141017990, £8.99This being t...
The war on terrorism has dramatically impacted the direction of U.S. foreign policy, as well as the ...
The attitude of past United States administrations to public international law, particularly but not...
Arguably one of the seminal challenges of the twenty-first century will be the place of public inter...
Despite Iraq\u27s complete disdain for international law, the community of States, acting in accorda...
The recent invasion of Iraq challenges a cornerstone of contemporary international law: the prohibit...
The Iraq war was a multiple assault on the foundations and rules of the existing UN-centered world o...
This edited collection by Austin Sarat and Nasser Hussain starts by noting that during the George W....
Soon after September 11, President Bush declared a global war on terrorism and members of terrorist ...
This article explores the influence of international law in the evolution of the Bush Administration...
The paper is premised on the idea that the future course of international law will be impacted by th...
On September 6, 2006, President George W. Bush declared that the so-called “enhanced interrogation t...
This Article is devoted to the question of the future relevance of international law at a time when ...
The decision, in 2003, by the United States and the United Kingdom to go to war against Iraq was see...
Sixty years ago, the United States and Great Britain spearheaded efforts to create a new world order...
Philippe Sands (Penguin Books, London 2006) Paperback, Pp 432, ISBN 9780141017990, £8.99This being t...
The war on terrorism has dramatically impacted the direction of U.S. foreign policy, as well as the ...
The attitude of past United States administrations to public international law, particularly but not...
Arguably one of the seminal challenges of the twenty-first century will be the place of public inter...
Despite Iraq\u27s complete disdain for international law, the community of States, acting in accorda...
The recent invasion of Iraq challenges a cornerstone of contemporary international law: the prohibit...
The Iraq war was a multiple assault on the foundations and rules of the existing UN-centered world o...
This edited collection by Austin Sarat and Nasser Hussain starts by noting that during the George W....
Soon after September 11, President Bush declared a global war on terrorism and members of terrorist ...
This article explores the influence of international law in the evolution of the Bush Administration...
The paper is premised on the idea that the future course of international law will be impacted by th...
On September 6, 2006, President George W. Bush declared that the so-called “enhanced interrogation t...
This Article is devoted to the question of the future relevance of international law at a time when ...
The decision, in 2003, by the United States and the United Kingdom to go to war against Iraq was see...