In a 1982 case the Court of Justice of the European Communities recognized the existence of an attorney-client privilege in European Community law. The privilege recognized by the Court of Justice, however, is narrower in scope than its United States counterpart; and the 1982 case left unanswered many important questions concerning the privilege\u27s practical application in future cases. This Note examines the evolving doctrine of attorney-client privilege in Community law, with special attention given to the privilege\u27s effect upon United States attorneys and their clients who are subject to Community jurisdiction
Privilege determinations in international arbitration are currently the equivalent of the “wild west...
Frequently in litigation in the federal courts, discovery of papers, documents and the like in the p...
The divided panel decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit in /n re Lindsey, 158 F...
In a 1982 case the Court of Justice of the European Communities recognized the existence of an attor...
This Article briefly describes the origin of the Community confidentiality standard, emphasizing the...
Part I of this note considers whether U.S. federal and state law applies the attorney-client privile...
The AM & S Europe judgment by the Court of Justice of the European Union was the first ruling on the...
After sixty-six years of struggle and controversy surrounding the application of the attorney-client...
Part I of this Note examines two of the more popular standards, the Seventh Circuit\u27s subject ma...
The purpose for attorney-client privilege is to encourage open communications between the attorney a...
The attorney-client privilege recently has undergone significant social, political, and ideological ...
In seeking the advice of legal counsel, the corporation may, out of necessity, communicate through i...
An effective legal system requires that confidentiality between client and attorney be protected. On...
The gaps in the privilege at the international level present a major problem for general counsel. I...
At present inconsistent lower federal appellate court decisions governing the use of the attorney-cl...
Privilege determinations in international arbitration are currently the equivalent of the “wild west...
Frequently in litigation in the federal courts, discovery of papers, documents and the like in the p...
The divided panel decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit in /n re Lindsey, 158 F...
In a 1982 case the Court of Justice of the European Communities recognized the existence of an attor...
This Article briefly describes the origin of the Community confidentiality standard, emphasizing the...
Part I of this note considers whether U.S. federal and state law applies the attorney-client privile...
The AM & S Europe judgment by the Court of Justice of the European Union was the first ruling on the...
After sixty-six years of struggle and controversy surrounding the application of the attorney-client...
Part I of this Note examines two of the more popular standards, the Seventh Circuit\u27s subject ma...
The purpose for attorney-client privilege is to encourage open communications between the attorney a...
The attorney-client privilege recently has undergone significant social, political, and ideological ...
In seeking the advice of legal counsel, the corporation may, out of necessity, communicate through i...
An effective legal system requires that confidentiality between client and attorney be protected. On...
The gaps in the privilege at the international level present a major problem for general counsel. I...
At present inconsistent lower federal appellate court decisions governing the use of the attorney-cl...
Privilege determinations in international arbitration are currently the equivalent of the “wild west...
Frequently in litigation in the federal courts, discovery of papers, documents and the like in the p...
The divided panel decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit in /n re Lindsey, 158 F...