In a recent series of cases the Japanese Fair Trade Commission has adopted a strict illegality approach and held one of the more typical manufacturer-imposed market channelling arrangements to constitute an unfair business practice in violation of article 19 of the Japanese Antimonopoly and Fair Trade Law. This article assesses these cases and their implications in the context of Japanese antitrust regulation of marketing
This paper discusses extraterritorial applications of the Japanese Antimonopoly Act through a well d...
The Japan-U.S. economic relationship has been marked by tremendous friction and misunderstanding. Th...
This Article examines the original intent of those involved in drafting Japan\u27s Antimonopoly Ac...
In a recent series of cases the Japanese Fair Trade Commission has adopted a strict illegality appro...
The Japanese substantive competition law is, in theory, very well equipped to prevent anticompetitiv...
We review the facts pertaining to some recent antimonopoly cases in Japan involving interference wit...
We review the facts pertaining to some recent antimonopoly cases in Japan involving interference wit...
This article focuses on the legislative history of the Japanese Antimonopoly Law and a comparison be...
This article deals with the question of differences in competition policy enforcement regimes in Jap...
In this Article, I examine Japanese competition law and policy with a view toward increasing its eff...
This Article compares four jurisdictional approaches to anticompetitive behavior: (1) the U.S. “rule...
Article published in Amicus Curiae - Journal of the Society for Advanced Legal Studies. The Journal ...
How much has competition among Japanese firms changed? Have the tougher penalties provided under the...
Based on an extensive survey of corporate executives living and working in Japan, this study examine...
The Japanese antidumping law neither works nor is it practiced. Until very recently, it has been a c...
This paper discusses extraterritorial applications of the Japanese Antimonopoly Act through a well d...
The Japan-U.S. economic relationship has been marked by tremendous friction and misunderstanding. Th...
This Article examines the original intent of those involved in drafting Japan\u27s Antimonopoly Ac...
In a recent series of cases the Japanese Fair Trade Commission has adopted a strict illegality appro...
The Japanese substantive competition law is, in theory, very well equipped to prevent anticompetitiv...
We review the facts pertaining to some recent antimonopoly cases in Japan involving interference wit...
We review the facts pertaining to some recent antimonopoly cases in Japan involving interference wit...
This article focuses on the legislative history of the Japanese Antimonopoly Law and a comparison be...
This article deals with the question of differences in competition policy enforcement regimes in Jap...
In this Article, I examine Japanese competition law and policy with a view toward increasing its eff...
This Article compares four jurisdictional approaches to anticompetitive behavior: (1) the U.S. “rule...
Article published in Amicus Curiae - Journal of the Society for Advanced Legal Studies. The Journal ...
How much has competition among Japanese firms changed? Have the tougher penalties provided under the...
Based on an extensive survey of corporate executives living and working in Japan, this study examine...
The Japanese antidumping law neither works nor is it practiced. Until very recently, it has been a c...
This paper discusses extraterritorial applications of the Japanese Antimonopoly Act through a well d...
The Japan-U.S. economic relationship has been marked by tremendous friction and misunderstanding. Th...
This Article examines the original intent of those involved in drafting Japan\u27s Antimonopoly Ac...