Reverse payment settlements in pharmaceutical patent litigation, also known as pay for delay settlements, are almost universally anticompetitive. Nonetheless, because of the current regulatory framework and a failure of courts to address the definition of patent scope, many of these settlements are upheld as legal, falling under a patent exception to antitrust liability. The patent exception , however, does not apply to pay-for-delay settlements, because paying to protect a patent is inherently beyond the scope of that patent. This note addresses the problem of reverse payment settlements and proposes a new comprehensive solution
Within the tool-box developed by originator companies in order to prepare and respond to generic en...
Although brand-name pharmaceutical companies routinely procure patents on their innovative medicatio...
In FTC v. Actavis, the Supreme Court determined that courts should apply a rule of reason analysis t...
Reverse payment settlements in pharmaceutical patent litigation, also known as pay for delay settl...
At its passage, the Hatch-Waxman Act was hailed as a much-needed step in making generic drugs more r...
Congress has identified the recent trend of pharmaceutical companies to settle patent litigation und...
This Comment will examine how the particulars of the Hatch-Waxman Act, the regulatory scheme that go...
Patent settlements in which the patentee pays the alleged infringer to stay out of the market are la...
Reverse payment patent litigation settlements, wherein the payments flow from plaintiff brand name d...
An imminent US Supreme Court ruling should resolve one of the thorniest legal issues facing pharmace...
Several federal courts of appeal have recently ruled on the issue of whether a pharmaceutical patent...
Reverse payment patent litigation settlements, wherein the payments flow from plaintiff brand name d...
Since the passage of the Hatch-Waxman Act (the Act) in 1984, patent litigation in the pharmaceutica...
An imminent US Supreme Court ruling should resolve one of the thorniest legal issues facing pharmace...
Should a branded pharmaceutical company be allowed to pay a generic competitor to stay out of the ma...
Within the tool-box developed by originator companies in order to prepare and respond to generic en...
Although brand-name pharmaceutical companies routinely procure patents on their innovative medicatio...
In FTC v. Actavis, the Supreme Court determined that courts should apply a rule of reason analysis t...
Reverse payment settlements in pharmaceutical patent litigation, also known as pay for delay settl...
At its passage, the Hatch-Waxman Act was hailed as a much-needed step in making generic drugs more r...
Congress has identified the recent trend of pharmaceutical companies to settle patent litigation und...
This Comment will examine how the particulars of the Hatch-Waxman Act, the regulatory scheme that go...
Patent settlements in which the patentee pays the alleged infringer to stay out of the market are la...
Reverse payment patent litigation settlements, wherein the payments flow from plaintiff brand name d...
An imminent US Supreme Court ruling should resolve one of the thorniest legal issues facing pharmace...
Several federal courts of appeal have recently ruled on the issue of whether a pharmaceutical patent...
Reverse payment patent litigation settlements, wherein the payments flow from plaintiff brand name d...
Since the passage of the Hatch-Waxman Act (the Act) in 1984, patent litigation in the pharmaceutica...
An imminent US Supreme Court ruling should resolve one of the thorniest legal issues facing pharmace...
Should a branded pharmaceutical company be allowed to pay a generic competitor to stay out of the ma...
Within the tool-box developed by originator companies in order to prepare and respond to generic en...
Although brand-name pharmaceutical companies routinely procure patents on their innovative medicatio...
In FTC v. Actavis, the Supreme Court determined that courts should apply a rule of reason analysis t...