The design features of a useful article will not qualify for either copyright or trade dress protection if they are considered functional. The functionality doctrine is an elusive one; in the trade dress arena, courts have experienced considerable difficulty in setting forth functionality tests clearly. The author synthesizes several functionality standards from recent case law and discusses the merits of each. This Note suggests that in trade dress cases courts should distinguish between mechanical and non-mechanical products and apply different tests to each
Mr. Barber examines the Supreme Court\u27s recent treatment of trade dress protection for product co...
The protection of trade dress has become increasingly clouded in recent years. A forcethe functional...
The intersection between trade dress law and copyright law must be understood when seeking trade dre...
The design features of a useful article will not qualify for either copyright or trade dress protect...
This article proposes, as discussed below, that functionality should generally be broadly interprete...
In this Article, the author addresses an issue of continuing significant concern to trade dress owne...
Trade dress functionality stands for a reasonable premise: features which are essential to the use o...
The Supreme Court last addressed trade dress law’s functionality doctrine in TrafFix Devices, Inc. v...
In comparison to functionality doctrine in trade dress cases, scholars have paid relatively little a...
This article concerns trademark law\u27s functionality doctrine and the Supreme Court\u27s troubleso...
For much of American history, in order to promote competition among the producers of useful products...
Intellectual property distinguishes a protected work’s aesthetic value from its functionality. In so...
The functionality doctrine serves a unique role in trademark law: unlike virtually every other doctr...
In the last nine years, the United States Supreme Court decided four cases that concern trade dress ...
This Article relies on several cases that demonstrate how aesthetic functionality can be used to sup...
Mr. Barber examines the Supreme Court\u27s recent treatment of trade dress protection for product co...
The protection of trade dress has become increasingly clouded in recent years. A forcethe functional...
The intersection between trade dress law and copyright law must be understood when seeking trade dre...
The design features of a useful article will not qualify for either copyright or trade dress protect...
This article proposes, as discussed below, that functionality should generally be broadly interprete...
In this Article, the author addresses an issue of continuing significant concern to trade dress owne...
Trade dress functionality stands for a reasonable premise: features which are essential to the use o...
The Supreme Court last addressed trade dress law’s functionality doctrine in TrafFix Devices, Inc. v...
In comparison to functionality doctrine in trade dress cases, scholars have paid relatively little a...
This article concerns trademark law\u27s functionality doctrine and the Supreme Court\u27s troubleso...
For much of American history, in order to promote competition among the producers of useful products...
Intellectual property distinguishes a protected work’s aesthetic value from its functionality. In so...
The functionality doctrine serves a unique role in trademark law: unlike virtually every other doctr...
In the last nine years, the United States Supreme Court decided four cases that concern trade dress ...
This Article relies on several cases that demonstrate how aesthetic functionality can be used to sup...
Mr. Barber examines the Supreme Court\u27s recent treatment of trade dress protection for product co...
The protection of trade dress has become increasingly clouded in recent years. A forcethe functional...
The intersection between trade dress law and copyright law must be understood when seeking trade dre...