This paper discusses Japanese research on legal consciousness (ho-ishiki) and civil disputing. The author presents a recent explication of Takeyoshi Kawashima\u27s concept of legal consciousness as a cultural factor and also proposes to explore the possibility of treating it as an individual, attitudinal factor. He also reviews large-scale surveys of aggregate-level culture and studies on individual-level disputing behavior. The need and possibility of a longitudinal study of individual disputing behavior that uses individual-level attitudes and regional culture as explanatory variables is suggested
Scholarship on modern Japanese law tends to focus on the codification of Japan’s legal system in the...
We have in this volume four articles on legal change in China and Japan written by four distinguishe...
Each of the case studies presented in this volume is an important and fascinating story in its own r...
This paper discusses Japanese research on legal consciousness (ho-ishiki) and civil disputing. The a...
The 1963 publication of Takeyoshi Kawashima’s “Dispute Resolution in Contemporary Japan” has indelib...
In this paper, I wish to discuss two problems. Firstly, I wish to discuss what transformation of the...
In traditional comparative legal studies, Japan has always been considered peculiar or sui generic. ...
Legal consciousness is a vibrant research field attracting growing numbers of scholars worldwide. Ye...
Unlike Western legal consciousness, traditional Asian legal consciousness both dislikes and seeks to...
“NEW RIGHTS” MOVEMENTS AND TRADITIONAL SOCIAL PROTEST Student activism in the 1960s, and citizens\u2...
Working from Professor Haley’s division of the historical process into four major temporal component...
Over the past fifteen years there has been a remarkable growth in the study of Japanese law in the U...
In 2009, Japan introduced a new lay judge system, saiban-in seido, in which Japanese citizens partic...
RIGHTS, MODERNIZATION, AND THE “UNIQUENESS” OF THE JAPANESE LEGAL SYSTEM Since the postwar period, t...
Over the past fifteen years there has been a remarkable growth in the study of Japanese law in the U...
Scholarship on modern Japanese law tends to focus on the codification of Japan’s legal system in the...
We have in this volume four articles on legal change in China and Japan written by four distinguishe...
Each of the case studies presented in this volume is an important and fascinating story in its own r...
This paper discusses Japanese research on legal consciousness (ho-ishiki) and civil disputing. The a...
The 1963 publication of Takeyoshi Kawashima’s “Dispute Resolution in Contemporary Japan” has indelib...
In this paper, I wish to discuss two problems. Firstly, I wish to discuss what transformation of the...
In traditional comparative legal studies, Japan has always been considered peculiar or sui generic. ...
Legal consciousness is a vibrant research field attracting growing numbers of scholars worldwide. Ye...
Unlike Western legal consciousness, traditional Asian legal consciousness both dislikes and seeks to...
“NEW RIGHTS” MOVEMENTS AND TRADITIONAL SOCIAL PROTEST Student activism in the 1960s, and citizens\u2...
Working from Professor Haley’s division of the historical process into four major temporal component...
Over the past fifteen years there has been a remarkable growth in the study of Japanese law in the U...
In 2009, Japan introduced a new lay judge system, saiban-in seido, in which Japanese citizens partic...
RIGHTS, MODERNIZATION, AND THE “UNIQUENESS” OF THE JAPANESE LEGAL SYSTEM Since the postwar period, t...
Over the past fifteen years there has been a remarkable growth in the study of Japanese law in the U...
Scholarship on modern Japanese law tends to focus on the codification of Japan’s legal system in the...
We have in this volume four articles on legal change in China and Japan written by four distinguishe...
Each of the case studies presented in this volume is an important and fascinating story in its own r...