As a fiction writer and a reader of judicial opinions, I have observed that judicial opinion writing and fiction have many parallels--both are narratives, both put order to perception, and both communicate from an author to a reader through language. However, despite these lingual similarities, I feel alienated when I read judicial opinions, and I turn to fiction reading and writing for comfort and validation. And so curiosity and frustration have led to this exploration. I want to know what it is about judicial opinions that is alienating, and what it is about fiction that is validating. I then want to incorporate the validating factors of fiction into judicial opinions so I, and others like me, do not feel alienated. It is possible to inc...
In this paper, we spin the question “Will Women Judges Really Make a Difference?” in another directi...
The utterances and narrative acts by scientists, lawyers, judges, and other courtroom actors may con...
The vast majority of current scholarship on judicial writing neither acknowledges nor explores the u...
As a fiction writer and a reader of judicial opinions, I have observed that judicial opinion writing...
The tendency in combinations of law and literature has been to reach for similarities and conflation...
This paper examines the functions of narrative within written legal argumentation. My purposes are t...
This Article draws upon the ideas of Mikhail Bakhtin to critique judicial discourse as embodied in w...
The story of the woman judge as one of exclusion and isolation plagued with allegations of bias is w...
Applicants to the federal judiciary identify three main audiences for their decisions: the involved ...
The first section of this Article discusses the judge as an author. This section begins with an exam...
The question the papers in this Special Issue address is whether it matters how judicial opinions ar...
When I sold my first novel the summer after my first year as a tenure-track law professor, I assured...
The law’s most familiar and characteristic mode of written expression, the judgment, lacks two of th...
All judges legitimize their decisions in writing, but US Supreme Court justices depend on public acc...
This essay offers a perspective-shifting approach to meeting some of our pedagogical goals in law sc...
In this paper, we spin the question “Will Women Judges Really Make a Difference?” in another directi...
The utterances and narrative acts by scientists, lawyers, judges, and other courtroom actors may con...
The vast majority of current scholarship on judicial writing neither acknowledges nor explores the u...
As a fiction writer and a reader of judicial opinions, I have observed that judicial opinion writing...
The tendency in combinations of law and literature has been to reach for similarities and conflation...
This paper examines the functions of narrative within written legal argumentation. My purposes are t...
This Article draws upon the ideas of Mikhail Bakhtin to critique judicial discourse as embodied in w...
The story of the woman judge as one of exclusion and isolation plagued with allegations of bias is w...
Applicants to the federal judiciary identify three main audiences for their decisions: the involved ...
The first section of this Article discusses the judge as an author. This section begins with an exam...
The question the papers in this Special Issue address is whether it matters how judicial opinions ar...
When I sold my first novel the summer after my first year as a tenure-track law professor, I assured...
The law’s most familiar and characteristic mode of written expression, the judgment, lacks two of th...
All judges legitimize their decisions in writing, but US Supreme Court justices depend on public acc...
This essay offers a perspective-shifting approach to meeting some of our pedagogical goals in law sc...
In this paper, we spin the question “Will Women Judges Really Make a Difference?” in another directi...
The utterances and narrative acts by scientists, lawyers, judges, and other courtroom actors may con...
The vast majority of current scholarship on judicial writing neither acknowledges nor explores the u...