This paper compares the Alberta and Saskatchewan governments’ public consultation process for the introduction of nuclear power in their provinces. While the goal was the same – to gauge public reaction on a continuous policy issue – the design of their respective consultation process was quite different. The paper analyzes the techniques of public consultation in the nuclear sector, especially the use of public hearings and multiple consultative tools. Finally, it assesses the impact that public consultation has on government decision-making
Australia currently lacks a mechanism to gather evidence on the formation of public attitudes to the...
In this paper, I examine how the nuclear incidents at Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, and Fukushima im...
Nuclear power is undergoing a revival in a number of countries of both developed and developing worl...
This paper is an effort to identify, as comprehensively as possible, public concerns about nuclear p...
This document discusses public opinion regarding nuclear power which is particularly difficult to ti...
The nuclear debate has become once again a ‘live’ policy issue in UK national politics, with far-rea...
This short briefing provides an outline of the Sustainable Development Commission's advice to the Go...
[Excerpt] Commercial nuclear reactors in the United States have been producing electricity and high...
In 2007 the UK government's public consultation on the future of nuclear power courted much criticis...
This paper is the seventh in a series of 8 that make up the evidence base for SDC report 'The role o...
What is the nature of citizen, policymaker, and scientific expert deliberation on U.S. nuclear weapo...
Nuclear power plants are seen as an effective alternative to fossil fuels as they are more reliable ...
This study explores engagement with Northern and Indigenous peoples and communities, using principle...
Nuclear energy experts consider commercial power from fission to be a strong contender to help mitig...
The Event Report of the Civic Exchange Energy Forum 16: No More Muddling Through can be viewed at: h...
Australia currently lacks a mechanism to gather evidence on the formation of public attitudes to the...
In this paper, I examine how the nuclear incidents at Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, and Fukushima im...
Nuclear power is undergoing a revival in a number of countries of both developed and developing worl...
This paper is an effort to identify, as comprehensively as possible, public concerns about nuclear p...
This document discusses public opinion regarding nuclear power which is particularly difficult to ti...
The nuclear debate has become once again a ‘live’ policy issue in UK national politics, with far-rea...
This short briefing provides an outline of the Sustainable Development Commission's advice to the Go...
[Excerpt] Commercial nuclear reactors in the United States have been producing electricity and high...
In 2007 the UK government's public consultation on the future of nuclear power courted much criticis...
This paper is the seventh in a series of 8 that make up the evidence base for SDC report 'The role o...
What is the nature of citizen, policymaker, and scientific expert deliberation on U.S. nuclear weapo...
Nuclear power plants are seen as an effective alternative to fossil fuels as they are more reliable ...
This study explores engagement with Northern and Indigenous peoples and communities, using principle...
Nuclear energy experts consider commercial power from fission to be a strong contender to help mitig...
The Event Report of the Civic Exchange Energy Forum 16: No More Muddling Through can be viewed at: h...
Australia currently lacks a mechanism to gather evidence on the formation of public attitudes to the...
In this paper, I examine how the nuclear incidents at Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, and Fukushima im...
Nuclear power is undergoing a revival in a number of countries of both developed and developing worl...