A vivid and controversial debate followed the publication of Empire by Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri. This contribution discusses the concept of biopower as it is presented in the book. While the authors modify and expand the use of the notion that was developed by Michel Foucault, they produce several systematic problems and theoretical ambivalences. As it will be shown, Hardt and Negri claim to ground their analysis in a "field of immanence", but partly fail to do so, weakening their own political and critical perspectlve
Following Michel Foucault, the term of "biopower" has been widely used by many researchers in the so...
This paper shows how "Empire" from Negri and Hardt is a good exemplification of the "immanentist" tu...
This paper problematizes biopolitics discussion in the context of contemporary political philosophy:...
This study focuses on the ideas of Antonio Negri and Michael Hardt, the most influential thinkers of...
In this paper, I analyze and compare the theses of Giorgio Agamben, Antonio Negri and Roberto Espo...
In this paper we want to open up for discussion what counts as `biopolitics'öa term frequently used...
Hardt and Negri’s book Empire (2000) attempts a synthesis of Marxian and poststructuralist ideas. Ex...
This text examines the theses on Foucaultian biopolitics by Giorgio Agamben and Antonio Negri. The t...
This essay reflects on the reception and the use of biopolitics in Antonio Negri's work. Within cert...
This paper develops a genealogical critique of the concepts of biopower and biopolitics in the work ...
Bakalaura darbā „Biopolitikas koncepts M. Fuko darbos” tiek apskatīts biopolitikas jēdziens no Mišel...
In this study, we examined the concept of biopolitics, a concept developed by Michel Foucault, in th...
Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri’s late research programme can be described as a philosophical and th...
The term biopolitics can be fully understood only within the context of modern forms of governing so...
In this paper, I will provide an interpretation of Foucauldian theoretical understanding ...
Following Michel Foucault, the term of "biopower" has been widely used by many researchers in the so...
This paper shows how "Empire" from Negri and Hardt is a good exemplification of the "immanentist" tu...
This paper problematizes biopolitics discussion in the context of contemporary political philosophy:...
This study focuses on the ideas of Antonio Negri and Michael Hardt, the most influential thinkers of...
In this paper, I analyze and compare the theses of Giorgio Agamben, Antonio Negri and Roberto Espo...
In this paper we want to open up for discussion what counts as `biopolitics'öa term frequently used...
Hardt and Negri’s book Empire (2000) attempts a synthesis of Marxian and poststructuralist ideas. Ex...
This text examines the theses on Foucaultian biopolitics by Giorgio Agamben and Antonio Negri. The t...
This essay reflects on the reception and the use of biopolitics in Antonio Negri's work. Within cert...
This paper develops a genealogical critique of the concepts of biopower and biopolitics in the work ...
Bakalaura darbā „Biopolitikas koncepts M. Fuko darbos” tiek apskatīts biopolitikas jēdziens no Mišel...
In this study, we examined the concept of biopolitics, a concept developed by Michel Foucault, in th...
Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri’s late research programme can be described as a philosophical and th...
The term biopolitics can be fully understood only within the context of modern forms of governing so...
In this paper, I will provide an interpretation of Foucauldian theoretical understanding ...
Following Michel Foucault, the term of "biopower" has been widely used by many researchers in the so...
This paper shows how "Empire" from Negri and Hardt is a good exemplification of the "immanentist" tu...
This paper problematizes biopolitics discussion in the context of contemporary political philosophy:...