This article argues that the Third Restatement of Products Liability, far from accomplishing its goal of eliminating strict liability for products, actually caused its revival. Prior to the adoption of the Third Restatement, many jurisdictions had gradually retreated from the strict products liability of Section 402A of the Second Restatement of Torts. The Third Restatement caused the courts to confront their own incremental processes and, in refusing the adopt the Third Restatement, to reinstate Section 402A of the Second Restatement in a much purer form
This paper was presented before the Division of Food Drug Cosmetic Law, Section of Corporation, Bank...
American products liability buffs, who often have a predilection for history, may remember 1994 as a...
The past thirty years have witnessed the significant expansion and transformation of products liabil...
This article argues that the Third Restatement of Products Liability, far from accomplishing its goa...
Strict liability in tort has occupied the core of modern products liability doctrine ever since Dean...
Professor Wertheimer has proposed that courts be allowed to hold producers strictly liable for produ...
The adoption of Section 402A of the Restatement (Second) of Torts in 1965 is commonly viewed as init...
Section 402A of the Restatement (Second) of Torts forever changed the means by which an individual w...
Strict liability has always been the heart and soul of American products liability law. As early as ...
The Restatement (Third) of Torts is expected to continue the consumer-oriented trend that began with...
The proposed section 2(b) of the Restatement (Third) of Torts: Products Liability has caused a great...
The author considers whether strict liability should be imposed for injuries caused by products that...
Strict liability for ultra-hazardous activities is entirely different from strict products liability...
Professor Madden evaluates the treatment of potential design and informational obligation liability ...
In the products liability area the pendulum has now swung back to the imposition of strict liability...
This paper was presented before the Division of Food Drug Cosmetic Law, Section of Corporation, Bank...
American products liability buffs, who often have a predilection for history, may remember 1994 as a...
The past thirty years have witnessed the significant expansion and transformation of products liabil...
This article argues that the Third Restatement of Products Liability, far from accomplishing its goa...
Strict liability in tort has occupied the core of modern products liability doctrine ever since Dean...
Professor Wertheimer has proposed that courts be allowed to hold producers strictly liable for produ...
The adoption of Section 402A of the Restatement (Second) of Torts in 1965 is commonly viewed as init...
Section 402A of the Restatement (Second) of Torts forever changed the means by which an individual w...
Strict liability has always been the heart and soul of American products liability law. As early as ...
The Restatement (Third) of Torts is expected to continue the consumer-oriented trend that began with...
The proposed section 2(b) of the Restatement (Third) of Torts: Products Liability has caused a great...
The author considers whether strict liability should be imposed for injuries caused by products that...
Strict liability for ultra-hazardous activities is entirely different from strict products liability...
Professor Madden evaluates the treatment of potential design and informational obligation liability ...
In the products liability area the pendulum has now swung back to the imposition of strict liability...
This paper was presented before the Division of Food Drug Cosmetic Law, Section of Corporation, Bank...
American products liability buffs, who often have a predilection for history, may remember 1994 as a...
The past thirty years have witnessed the significant expansion and transformation of products liabil...