The property-liability rules framework, which offers a robust positive theory of criminal law, has come under attack in recent years. One critique, which I label the Indifference Proposition, argues that property rules and liability rules are equivalent in low transaction cost settings. In this paper I examine the conditions under which the Indifference Proposition is valid. In several plausible low transaction-cost settings the proposition is not valid
textabstractCalabresi and Melamed delivered a powerful theory to explain under what conditions it is...
Property Rules, as famously described by Calabresi and Melamed, are remedial rules that place a proh...
In recent years, new articles presenting rigorous analyses of bargaining incentives have overturned ...
In recent years, new articles presenting rigorous analyses of bargaining incentives have overturned ...
Kaplow and Shavell have recently claimed that property rules tend to protect tangible entitlements m...
What role does defensive conduct play in a utilitarian theory of tort law? Why are rational (as oppo...
Louis Kaplow and Steven Shavell\u27s thoughtful reply to our recent article contains powerful insigh...
Strong, property rule protection—implemented via injunctions, criminal sanctions, and supercompensat...
Louis Kaplow and Steven Shavell\u27s thoughtful reply to our recent article contains powerful insigh...
Louis Kaplow and Steven Shavell\u27s thoughtful reply to our recent article contains powerful insigh...
Strong, property rule protection—implemented via injunctions, criminal sanctions, and supercompensat...
Ronald Coase\u27s essay on The Problem of Social Cost introduced the world to transaction costs, a...
Property Rules, as famously described by Calabresi and Melamed, are remedial rules that place a proh...
This Article builds on the literature generated by Calabresi and Melamed’s framework for protecting ...
Property Rules, as famously described by Calabresi and Melamed, are remedial rules that place a proh...
textabstractCalabresi and Melamed delivered a powerful theory to explain under what conditions it is...
Property Rules, as famously described by Calabresi and Melamed, are remedial rules that place a proh...
In recent years, new articles presenting rigorous analyses of bargaining incentives have overturned ...
In recent years, new articles presenting rigorous analyses of bargaining incentives have overturned ...
Kaplow and Shavell have recently claimed that property rules tend to protect tangible entitlements m...
What role does defensive conduct play in a utilitarian theory of tort law? Why are rational (as oppo...
Louis Kaplow and Steven Shavell\u27s thoughtful reply to our recent article contains powerful insigh...
Strong, property rule protection—implemented via injunctions, criminal sanctions, and supercompensat...
Louis Kaplow and Steven Shavell\u27s thoughtful reply to our recent article contains powerful insigh...
Louis Kaplow and Steven Shavell\u27s thoughtful reply to our recent article contains powerful insigh...
Strong, property rule protection—implemented via injunctions, criminal sanctions, and supercompensat...
Ronald Coase\u27s essay on The Problem of Social Cost introduced the world to transaction costs, a...
Property Rules, as famously described by Calabresi and Melamed, are remedial rules that place a proh...
This Article builds on the literature generated by Calabresi and Melamed’s framework for protecting ...
Property Rules, as famously described by Calabresi and Melamed, are remedial rules that place a proh...
textabstractCalabresi and Melamed delivered a powerful theory to explain under what conditions it is...
Property Rules, as famously described by Calabresi and Melamed, are remedial rules that place a proh...
In recent years, new articles presenting rigorous analyses of bargaining incentives have overturned ...