Alon Harel’s Why Law Matters is a laudable attempt to sharpen our understanding of how the law deals with complicated moral phenomena, and of why and how these phenomena should matter to the law. I wholeheartedly agree with the non-reductionist spirit of Harel’s project. But I here offer a handful of objections to the letter of some of Harel’s positions, in the hopes that they may contribute to the advancement of the debate surrounding these difficult and important issues
The relationship between law and morality has emerged as the central question in the jurisprudential...
The emerging interdisciplinary field of “Law and Emotions” brings together scholars from law, psycho...
Hart believes that one truism of human nature is that the overwhelming majority of human beings wish...
Alon Harel defines extreme cases as those in which the only way to avert a destructive threat is to ...
Political philosophers have long debated the problem of political and legal obligation: how the exis...
Political philosophers have long debated the problem of political and legal obligation: how the exis...
A seminar held in the Hebrew University of Jerusalem in December 2012 discussed critical comments by...
During most of this century, a distinct separation has existed between natural law perspectives and ...
Although tragic choices are a common phenomenon in human experience, dominant conceptions of legal r...
There is an ongoing debate in contemporary jurisprudence over whether law, properly conceived, is ca...
Philosophical debates over the fundamental principles that should guide life-and-death medical decis...
If your self-driving Volvo suddenly must decide whether to swerve into one pedestrian in order to av...
Criticism of law and legal discourse as such has been part of an important vein of legal philosophy ...
In this article the concept of the tragic legal choice is established as an indispensable complement...
The question considered in the session was whether the concern of legal ethics is the morality of la...
The relationship between law and morality has emerged as the central question in the jurisprudential...
The emerging interdisciplinary field of “Law and Emotions” brings together scholars from law, psycho...
Hart believes that one truism of human nature is that the overwhelming majority of human beings wish...
Alon Harel defines extreme cases as those in which the only way to avert a destructive threat is to ...
Political philosophers have long debated the problem of political and legal obligation: how the exis...
Political philosophers have long debated the problem of political and legal obligation: how the exis...
A seminar held in the Hebrew University of Jerusalem in December 2012 discussed critical comments by...
During most of this century, a distinct separation has existed between natural law perspectives and ...
Although tragic choices are a common phenomenon in human experience, dominant conceptions of legal r...
There is an ongoing debate in contemporary jurisprudence over whether law, properly conceived, is ca...
Philosophical debates over the fundamental principles that should guide life-and-death medical decis...
If your self-driving Volvo suddenly must decide whether to swerve into one pedestrian in order to av...
Criticism of law and legal discourse as such has been part of an important vein of legal philosophy ...
In this article the concept of the tragic legal choice is established as an indispensable complement...
The question considered in the session was whether the concern of legal ethics is the morality of la...
The relationship between law and morality has emerged as the central question in the jurisprudential...
The emerging interdisciplinary field of “Law and Emotions” brings together scholars from law, psycho...
Hart believes that one truism of human nature is that the overwhelming majority of human beings wish...