In August 2011, the Administrative Office of the United States Courts published several rules for public comment. The amendment to Rule 11 would require the judge to apprise a defendant who wishes to plead guilty that, if convicted and not a United States citizen, the defendant may be deported, denied citizenship, and denied future admission to the United States. Several amendments have been proposed for Rule 12 with reference to the appropriate times for pleadings and pretrial motions, and the consequences and standards of review for untimely motions. The change to Rule 34 is intended to conform the rule to the proposed amendments to Rule 12, which would remove language that a claim that the indictment or information fails to state an of...
This comment describes current Washington law on the use of criminal convictions to impeach the test...
In a very unusual step, Congress enacted Federal Rule of Evidence 502. This rule deals with the att...
This Note advocates that federal courts review state criminal convictions in habeas corpus proceedin...
In January 2008 and June 2008, the Standing Committee on the Rules of Procedure and Evidence authori...
Amendments to the Federal Rules of Procedure and Evidence become effective three years from initial ...
A number of amendments to the Federal Rules of Procedure and Evidence became effective on December 1...
In August 2000, the Judicial Conference’s Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure published—for...
The purpose of this comment is to trace the history of the motion for more definite statement as pro...
Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 governs how a defendant must be counseled when pleading guilty...
After the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (1938) established a uniform set of procedures for the tr...
Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure governs perhaps the most essential and common pra...
Proposed far-reaching changes in the Federal Rules of Evidence are of major practical significance t...
On its face, Federal Rule of Evidence 801(d)(2) is elegantly simple. Distinguishing between neither ...
One John Memolo was convicted of tax evasion in the District Court of the United States for the Midd...
Amends section 13 of Article I, and section 19 of Article VI, of Constitution. Declares in any crimi...
This comment describes current Washington law on the use of criminal convictions to impeach the test...
In a very unusual step, Congress enacted Federal Rule of Evidence 502. This rule deals with the att...
This Note advocates that federal courts review state criminal convictions in habeas corpus proceedin...
In January 2008 and June 2008, the Standing Committee on the Rules of Procedure and Evidence authori...
Amendments to the Federal Rules of Procedure and Evidence become effective three years from initial ...
A number of amendments to the Federal Rules of Procedure and Evidence became effective on December 1...
In August 2000, the Judicial Conference’s Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure published—for...
The purpose of this comment is to trace the history of the motion for more definite statement as pro...
Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 governs how a defendant must be counseled when pleading guilty...
After the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (1938) established a uniform set of procedures for the tr...
Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure governs perhaps the most essential and common pra...
Proposed far-reaching changes in the Federal Rules of Evidence are of major practical significance t...
On its face, Federal Rule of Evidence 801(d)(2) is elegantly simple. Distinguishing between neither ...
One John Memolo was convicted of tax evasion in the District Court of the United States for the Midd...
Amends section 13 of Article I, and section 19 of Article VI, of Constitution. Declares in any crimi...
This comment describes current Washington law on the use of criminal convictions to impeach the test...
In a very unusual step, Congress enacted Federal Rule of Evidence 502. This rule deals with the att...
This Note advocates that federal courts review state criminal convictions in habeas corpus proceedin...