Are funding decisions based on performance? : a comparison of approaches as practiced by the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, the U.S. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, and the World Bank's Multi-Country AIDS Program for Africa in Mozambique, Uganda, and Zambia

With contributions from William Okedi, Caesar Cheelo, Dirce Costa, Freddie Ssengooba, Eleásara Antunes, Bona Chitah, Elizabeth Ekirapa Kiracho, Lutangu Ingombe, Sylvia Mwamba, and David WendtTo better understand the relationship of funding decisions to demonstrated achievements, the report analyzes and compares approaches to performance-based funding of three of the largest global AIDS donors: the U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR); the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (the Global Fund); and the World Bank’s Multi-Country HIV/ AIDS Program for Africa (the MAP). The recommendations offer ways for donors to improve their current systems while laying the groundwork for more performance-based funding systems in the future