The author examines two theories of judicial review under the Charter, one proposed by D.M. Beatty in Putting the Charter to Work: Designing a Constitutional Labour Code, and the other by P. Monahan in Politics and the Constitution: The Charter, Federalism and the Supreme Court of Canada. He demonstrates how each of these theories attempts to reconcile judicial review under the Charter with the principles of democracy by portraying it (judicial review) as a means for realizing these principles. He then argues that both efforts are ultimately unsuccessful and, indeed, only compound the problems they identify and set out to redress
The author argues that the Court Challenges Program’s 2006 cancellation was based on claims that jud...
This paper examines several different theories surrounding judicial review and finds many of these t...
In this essay Professor Beatty joins the debate as to how, if at all, the Charter of Rights and Free...
The author examines two theories of judicial review under the Charter, one proposed by D.M. Beatty i...
This article provides a critique of recent books by two prominent Canadian constitutional theorists ...
This article challenges the conventional view of the pervasiveness of American-style judicial review...
The proponents of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms are fighting a mighty battle to show that, desp...
The author provides an analysis and critique of the various types of arguments advanced by Canadian ...
Defined as the function of the court to interpret and apply the constitution to particular circumsta...
The expanding role of Canadian courts since the introduction of the Charter has prompted critics to ...
Recent developments in judicial review have raised the possibility that the debate over judicial sup...
For those concerned about the democratic legitimacy of Charter review by Canadian courts, the idea o...
The problem of judicial review turns out to be a number of different problems that should be disag...
A theme of uneasiness, and even of guilt, colors the literature about judicial review. Many of those...
Two hundred years after its most famous invocation in Marbury v. Madison, judicial review has appare...
The author argues that the Court Challenges Program’s 2006 cancellation was based on claims that jud...
This paper examines several different theories surrounding judicial review and finds many of these t...
In this essay Professor Beatty joins the debate as to how, if at all, the Charter of Rights and Free...
The author examines two theories of judicial review under the Charter, one proposed by D.M. Beatty i...
This article provides a critique of recent books by two prominent Canadian constitutional theorists ...
This article challenges the conventional view of the pervasiveness of American-style judicial review...
The proponents of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms are fighting a mighty battle to show that, desp...
The author provides an analysis and critique of the various types of arguments advanced by Canadian ...
Defined as the function of the court to interpret and apply the constitution to particular circumsta...
The expanding role of Canadian courts since the introduction of the Charter has prompted critics to ...
Recent developments in judicial review have raised the possibility that the debate over judicial sup...
For those concerned about the democratic legitimacy of Charter review by Canadian courts, the idea o...
The problem of judicial review turns out to be a number of different problems that should be disag...
A theme of uneasiness, and even of guilt, colors the literature about judicial review. Many of those...
Two hundred years after its most famous invocation in Marbury v. Madison, judicial review has appare...
The author argues that the Court Challenges Program’s 2006 cancellation was based on claims that jud...
This paper examines several different theories surrounding judicial review and finds many of these t...
In this essay Professor Beatty joins the debate as to how, if at all, the Charter of Rights and Free...