This essay explores the apparent triumph of the individual of classical liberalism in Supreme Court decision making. Our analysis examines the particular way in which this political imagery of the individual interacts with judicial assumptions about important social institutions: the family, religion, media, and the state. What is revealed is the judicial adoption of an intricate social and political map in which abstract individualism combines with, and often masks, traditional, conservative images of social order and moral choice
In the traditional approach to ideological classification, “liberal” judicial decisions are those th...
In Liberalism and American Constitutional Law, Rogers M. Smith of Yale University takes stock of the...
This Article offers a more sophisticated account of elite theory that incorporates the crucial insig...
This essay explores the apparent triumph of the individual of classical liberalism in Supreme Court ...
This paper seeks to draw out four different, and often conflicting, themes that inform the Supreme C...
Constitutional scholars do not typically employ spatial reasoning in their work. And yet, constituti...
This paper evaluates arguments made in Ran Hirschl\u27s powerful and sobering book, Towards Juristoc...
This study seeks to add to the current understanding of the political nature of the Supreme Court of...
The aim of this Article is to introduce and clarify a new way of thinking about decisions in close c...
This paper examines how justices on the Supreme Court of Canada voted in Charter appeals between 200...
This paper takes as its starting point a the oretical gap in the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court ...
The article\u27s central thesis is that the understandings of the constitutional tradition most cent...
Sherry presents information concerning the labeling of court decisions as being liberal or conservat...
American constitutional theory faces a dilemma. The United States Supreme Court has decided a large ...
This essay is an attempt to analyze, for the non-American reader especially, some of the factors tha...
In the traditional approach to ideological classification, “liberal” judicial decisions are those th...
In Liberalism and American Constitutional Law, Rogers M. Smith of Yale University takes stock of the...
This Article offers a more sophisticated account of elite theory that incorporates the crucial insig...
This essay explores the apparent triumph of the individual of classical liberalism in Supreme Court ...
This paper seeks to draw out four different, and often conflicting, themes that inform the Supreme C...
Constitutional scholars do not typically employ spatial reasoning in their work. And yet, constituti...
This paper evaluates arguments made in Ran Hirschl\u27s powerful and sobering book, Towards Juristoc...
This study seeks to add to the current understanding of the political nature of the Supreme Court of...
The aim of this Article is to introduce and clarify a new way of thinking about decisions in close c...
This paper examines how justices on the Supreme Court of Canada voted in Charter appeals between 200...
This paper takes as its starting point a the oretical gap in the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court ...
The article\u27s central thesis is that the understandings of the constitutional tradition most cent...
Sherry presents information concerning the labeling of court decisions as being liberal or conservat...
American constitutional theory faces a dilemma. The United States Supreme Court has decided a large ...
This essay is an attempt to analyze, for the non-American reader especially, some of the factors tha...
In the traditional approach to ideological classification, “liberal” judicial decisions are those th...
In Liberalism and American Constitutional Law, Rogers M. Smith of Yale University takes stock of the...
This Article offers a more sophisticated account of elite theory that incorporates the crucial insig...