Family‐based prevention programs may have little to no effect on reducing alcohol use in adolescents, but clinical trial evidence is of low certainty. Clinical trials vary considerably both in type (universal, selective, indicated) and duration of family interventions and comparisons assessed. Subgroup analyses examining results by intervention type are generally consistent with the main results, except for small benefit of a universal family‐based intervention for reducing the volume of alcohol consumption. No RCTs assessed adverse effects of the interventions
Objectives The Strengthening Families Programme 10–14 (SFP10-14) is a USA-developed universal group-...
Question: How are commonly used screening methods for alcohol and drug use associated with implemen...
Item does not contain fulltextAim: To explore whether specific groups of adolescents (i.e., scoring ...
When adolescents and adults whose alcohol consumption had been screened as hazardous or harmful (mos...
For adolescents and adults attending primary care settings who had experienced harm due to excessive...
Manualized Alcoholics Anonymous or other 12‐step programs are effective in terms of abstinence and m...
Randomized controlled trials indicate that brief interventions are more effective than usual care in...
Group based interventions for mothers and mothers plus children reduced mental health problems in ad...
Question: Is manualized cognitive behavioral therapy–based indicated prevention effective in reduci...
BACKGROUND: Prevention of alcohol, drug and tobacco misuse by young people is a key public health pr...
Motivational interviewing may reduce the volume and frequency of alcohol consumption of adolescent a...
The results of this review indicate that there are no clear benefits of family‐based programmes for ...
BACKGROUND: Prevention of alcohol, drug and tobacco misuse by young people is a key public health pr...
When a group‐format behavioral program (including identification of high‐risk situations, cognitive ...
Background: In the Netherlands, children start to drink at an early age; of the Dutch 12-year olds, ...
Objectives The Strengthening Families Programme 10–14 (SFP10-14) is a USA-developed universal group-...
Question: How are commonly used screening methods for alcohol and drug use associated with implemen...
Item does not contain fulltextAim: To explore whether specific groups of adolescents (i.e., scoring ...
When adolescents and adults whose alcohol consumption had been screened as hazardous or harmful (mos...
For adolescents and adults attending primary care settings who had experienced harm due to excessive...
Manualized Alcoholics Anonymous or other 12‐step programs are effective in terms of abstinence and m...
Randomized controlled trials indicate that brief interventions are more effective than usual care in...
Group based interventions for mothers and mothers plus children reduced mental health problems in ad...
Question: Is manualized cognitive behavioral therapy–based indicated prevention effective in reduci...
BACKGROUND: Prevention of alcohol, drug and tobacco misuse by young people is a key public health pr...
Motivational interviewing may reduce the volume and frequency of alcohol consumption of adolescent a...
The results of this review indicate that there are no clear benefits of family‐based programmes for ...
BACKGROUND: Prevention of alcohol, drug and tobacco misuse by young people is a key public health pr...
When a group‐format behavioral program (including identification of high‐risk situations, cognitive ...
Background: In the Netherlands, children start to drink at an early age; of the Dutch 12-year olds, ...
Objectives The Strengthening Families Programme 10–14 (SFP10-14) is a USA-developed universal group-...
Question: How are commonly used screening methods for alcohol and drug use associated with implemen...
Item does not contain fulltextAim: To explore whether specific groups of adolescents (i.e., scoring ...