Add to ORKGThis paper was presented in the Panel 'Variation in the Early Texts of Shakespeare: Causes and Consequences' at the Conference 'Rethinking Early Modern Print Culture' at University of Toronto 22-24 October. The website is at: http://crrs.ca/events/crrs-conference-rethinking-early-modern-print-culture
This dissertation is a bibliographic study of William Shakespeare's 1623 First Folio. It extends Cha...
Responds to a recent article by Peter Shillingsburg (in Studies in Bibliography , 1991)on the taxono...
This thesis explores how literary editing for the dramatic publication was developed in seventeenth-...
This paper was presented on 9 April 2010 in the Panel ''Texts in Motion (II): Collating Press Varian...
Play scripts differ from prose narratives and poetry because they are meant to undergo a further tra...
The file attached to this record is the authors final peer reviewed version. The final publishers ve...
This is a conference paper.No-one reads a Shakespeare play more closely than an editor making a cri...
The Arts: 3rd Place (The Ohio State University Edward F. Hayes Graduate Research Forum)Shakespeare's...
This paper presents a study on spelling standardisation in Shakespeare’s first editions. Though cert...
A generation ago, many Shakespearean scholars simply accepted the versions of the play that they wer...
We know Shakespeare's writings only from imperfectly-made early editions, from which editors struggl...
The file attached to this record is the authors final peer reviewed version. The publishers final ve...
There the matter must rest, while we wait for more positive arguments, if possible, from within the ...
Within the context of the manifold intersections between textual scholarship and new digital technol...
Post-publication revision causes problems for both an AngloAmerican editorial tradition and genetic ...
This dissertation is a bibliographic study of William Shakespeare's 1623 First Folio. It extends Cha...
Responds to a recent article by Peter Shillingsburg (in Studies in Bibliography , 1991)on the taxono...
This thesis explores how literary editing for the dramatic publication was developed in seventeenth-...
This paper was presented on 9 April 2010 in the Panel ''Texts in Motion (II): Collating Press Varian...
Play scripts differ from prose narratives and poetry because they are meant to undergo a further tra...
The file attached to this record is the authors final peer reviewed version. The final publishers ve...
This is a conference paper.No-one reads a Shakespeare play more closely than an editor making a cri...
The Arts: 3rd Place (The Ohio State University Edward F. Hayes Graduate Research Forum)Shakespeare's...
This paper presents a study on spelling standardisation in Shakespeare’s first editions. Though cert...
A generation ago, many Shakespearean scholars simply accepted the versions of the play that they wer...
We know Shakespeare's writings only from imperfectly-made early editions, from which editors struggl...
The file attached to this record is the authors final peer reviewed version. The publishers final ve...
There the matter must rest, while we wait for more positive arguments, if possible, from within the ...
Within the context of the manifold intersections between textual scholarship and new digital technol...
Post-publication revision causes problems for both an AngloAmerican editorial tradition and genetic ...
This dissertation is a bibliographic study of William Shakespeare's 1623 First Folio. It extends Cha...
Responds to a recent article by Peter Shillingsburg (in Studies in Bibliography , 1991)on the taxono...
This thesis explores how literary editing for the dramatic publication was developed in seventeenth-...