Add to ORKGThe Court held that Appellants provided insufficient evidence to show that Respondents had a duty to Appellant or breached their duty to Appellant. The Appellants failed to provide the required expert testimony necessary for a case concerning the professional conduct of a profession whose standards and procedures are not known to the public. Additionally, because the contract between the Appellants and the Respondents did not expressly name the Appellants as third-party beneficiaries, the Appellants do not have standing to request the contract be enforced
This is an appeal from a personal injury matter that resulted in a post-judgment district court orde...
In this appeal, the Court considered whether a jury may consider footwear impression evidence withou...
In an action on a contract the plaintiff claimed the entire contract price as damages on the theory ...
The Court held that Appellants provided insufficient evidence to show that Respondents had a duty to...
The Court determined that the district court erred when it precluded the appellant from testifying b...
The Court affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of respondents, holding t...
Plaintiff-appellant Binder & Binder, PC ( Binder ) appeals from a judgment entered on August 22, 200...
The Court determined that a defendant is not entitled to cross examine examiners who find him incomp...
The Court determined that, under NRS 11.258(1), a complaint is only void if it is served without a c...
An Indiana statute required county officers to publish reports of public business in two newspapers,...
On its face, Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals was about as easy a case as the Supreme Court ge...
Petitioner-appellant Peter Ottley filed a petition to confirm an arbitration award in the United Sta...
In an opinion drafted by Justice Herndon, the Court considered whether the district court erred in d...
This case is an appeal arising from a failed land sale contract. The Court considered three issues o...
proceeded to another issue – More so, none of the courts below took into consideration the clause co...
This is an appeal from a personal injury matter that resulted in a post-judgment district court orde...
In this appeal, the Court considered whether a jury may consider footwear impression evidence withou...
In an action on a contract the plaintiff claimed the entire contract price as damages on the theory ...
The Court held that Appellants provided insufficient evidence to show that Respondents had a duty to...
The Court determined that the district court erred when it precluded the appellant from testifying b...
The Court affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of respondents, holding t...
Plaintiff-appellant Binder & Binder, PC ( Binder ) appeals from a judgment entered on August 22, 200...
The Court determined that a defendant is not entitled to cross examine examiners who find him incomp...
The Court determined that, under NRS 11.258(1), a complaint is only void if it is served without a c...
An Indiana statute required county officers to publish reports of public business in two newspapers,...
On its face, Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals was about as easy a case as the Supreme Court ge...
Petitioner-appellant Peter Ottley filed a petition to confirm an arbitration award in the United Sta...
In an opinion drafted by Justice Herndon, the Court considered whether the district court erred in d...
This case is an appeal arising from a failed land sale contract. The Court considered three issues o...
proceeded to another issue – More so, none of the courts below took into consideration the clause co...
This is an appeal from a personal injury matter that resulted in a post-judgment district court orde...
In this appeal, the Court considered whether a jury may consider footwear impression evidence withou...
In an action on a contract the plaintiff claimed the entire contract price as damages on the theory ...