Add to ORKGThe Court held that a compensation insurer may not reduce the 25 percent limit on lump-sum payments for an employee’s permanent disability award on different subsequent injuries. The court affirmed the district court’s denial of appellants’ petition for judicial review
Response to petition for review of an Order of the Industrial Commission of Utah denying Petitioner\...
The Court determined that (1) an administrative officer must first determine whether to reopen a wor...
Appeal from a district court order denying a petition for judicial review of the appeals officer’s d...
The Court held that a compensation insurer may not reduce the 25 percent limit on lump-sum payments ...
The Court determined that NRS 616B.578(4) does not require an employer to know the precise medical t...
The Court concluded that the International Association of Firefighters’ (IAFF) grievance was not arb...
The Court affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of respondents, holding t...
The Court considers an appeal from a district court order. The Court clarified that medical treatmen...
The Court considers an appeal from a district court order denying a petition for judicial review in ...
After the insured had made formal claims for total disability benefits for four years without bringi...
The City of Mesquite asked the Court to determine which statute of limitations (“SOL”) applies to a ...
The Court held self-employed workers may still be entitled to temporary disability and the employee’...
When Maine’s Superintendent of Insurance told the state’s largest health insurer that it could not p...
NRS 286.510 provides that the eligibility depends on an employee spouse’s effective date of membersh...
Federal courts have grappled with the issue of whether claims under the Americans with Disabilities ...
Response to petition for review of an Order of the Industrial Commission of Utah denying Petitioner\...
The Court determined that (1) an administrative officer must first determine whether to reopen a wor...
Appeal from a district court order denying a petition for judicial review of the appeals officer’s d...
The Court held that a compensation insurer may not reduce the 25 percent limit on lump-sum payments ...
The Court determined that NRS 616B.578(4) does not require an employer to know the precise medical t...
The Court concluded that the International Association of Firefighters’ (IAFF) grievance was not arb...
The Court affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of respondents, holding t...
The Court considers an appeal from a district court order. The Court clarified that medical treatmen...
The Court considers an appeal from a district court order denying a petition for judicial review in ...
After the insured had made formal claims for total disability benefits for four years without bringi...
The City of Mesquite asked the Court to determine which statute of limitations (“SOL”) applies to a ...
The Court held self-employed workers may still be entitled to temporary disability and the employee’...
When Maine’s Superintendent of Insurance told the state’s largest health insurer that it could not p...
NRS 286.510 provides that the eligibility depends on an employee spouse’s effective date of membersh...
Federal courts have grappled with the issue of whether claims under the Americans with Disabilities ...
Response to petition for review of an Order of the Industrial Commission of Utah denying Petitioner\...
The Court determined that (1) an administrative officer must first determine whether to reopen a wor...
Appeal from a district court order denying a petition for judicial review of the appeals officer’s d...