How should the state face the challenge of radical pluralism? How can constitutional orders be changed when they prove unable to regulate society? Santi Romano, Carl Schmitt, and Costantino Mortati, the leading figures of Continental legal institutionalism, provided three responses that deserve our full attention today. Mariano Croce and Marco Goldoni introduce and analyze these three towering figures for a modern audience. Romano thought pluralism to be an inherent feature of legality and envisaged a far-reaching reform of the state for it to be a platform of negotiation between autonomous normative regimes. Schmitt believed pluralism to be a dangerous deviation that should be curbed through the juridical exclusion of alternative instituti...
This article juxtaposes Santi Romano’s legal-pluralist paradigm with other approaches to illustrate ...
One simple definition of legal pluralism is that it concerns the development of different legal tra...
What is constitutional pluralism? What does it stand for? What does it expect to achieve, or change ...
How should the state face the challenge of radical pluralism? How can constitutional orders be chang...
It is a pleasure and an honour for us to produce this Introduction to the symposium that The Italian...
Global Legal Pluralism recognizes the inevitability (and sometimes even the desirability) of multipl...
In this article, taking my cue from the insightful analyses contained in the book The Legacy of Plur...
Pluralism has made its way into European law literature already a long time ago. Some of its main ...
This work consists in a brief comment or reflection stimulated by a recent monograph, "The Legacy of...
The chapter will engage with recent pluralistic trends that put modern constitutionalism under strai...
What is constitutional pluralism? What does it stand for? What does it want to achieve, contribute,...
In the traditional legal culture, the expression of “ordering pluralism” is rather unusual. Pluralis...
Constitutional pluralism is a novel branch within constitutional thought and has its origin in the s...
Legal pluralism as a pre-modern and well-known phenomenon seemed to be domesticated by the 'modern s...
Constitutional pluralism has become immensely popular among scholars who study European integration ...
This article juxtaposes Santi Romano’s legal-pluralist paradigm with other approaches to illustrate ...
One simple definition of legal pluralism is that it concerns the development of different legal tra...
What is constitutional pluralism? What does it stand for? What does it expect to achieve, or change ...
How should the state face the challenge of radical pluralism? How can constitutional orders be chang...
It is a pleasure and an honour for us to produce this Introduction to the symposium that The Italian...
Global Legal Pluralism recognizes the inevitability (and sometimes even the desirability) of multipl...
In this article, taking my cue from the insightful analyses contained in the book The Legacy of Plur...
Pluralism has made its way into European law literature already a long time ago. Some of its main ...
This work consists in a brief comment or reflection stimulated by a recent monograph, "The Legacy of...
The chapter will engage with recent pluralistic trends that put modern constitutionalism under strai...
What is constitutional pluralism? What does it stand for? What does it want to achieve, contribute,...
In the traditional legal culture, the expression of “ordering pluralism” is rather unusual. Pluralis...
Constitutional pluralism is a novel branch within constitutional thought and has its origin in the s...
Legal pluralism as a pre-modern and well-known phenomenon seemed to be domesticated by the 'modern s...
Constitutional pluralism has become immensely popular among scholars who study European integration ...
This article juxtaposes Santi Romano’s legal-pluralist paradigm with other approaches to illustrate ...
One simple definition of legal pluralism is that it concerns the development of different legal tra...
What is constitutional pluralism? What does it stand for? What does it expect to achieve, or change ...