This paper has two aims. The first is critical: I identify a set of normative desiderata for accounts of justified belief and I argue that prominent knowledge first views have difficulties meeting them. Second, I argue that my preferred account, knowledge first functionalism, is preferable to its extant competitors on normative grounds. This account takes epistemically justified belief to be belief generated by properly functioning cognitive processes that have generating knowledge as their epistemic function
What do we mean when we say that a belief is justified? What justifies a belief? These are two very ...
This paper distinguishes two ways to \u27put knowledge first\u27. One way affirms a knowledge norm. ...
During the last twenty years or so a number of philosophers have proposed theories that attempt to n...
Recent knowledge first epistemology features a number of different accounts of justified belief, inc...
Here I advance a unified account of the structure of the epistemic normativity of assertion, action,...
Abstract: On the standard story about knowledge, knowledge has a normative dimension by virtue of th...
The standard objection against naturalised epistemology is that it cannot account for normativity in...
Epistemic warrant is that property which converts true belief to knowledge. A theory of epistemic wa...
According to a view I’ll call Epistemic Normativism (EN), knowledge is normative in the same sense i...
Proper functionalism explicates epistemic warrant in terms of the function and normal functioning of...
There are two central kinds of epistemological mistakes: believing things you shouldn’t, and failing...
Since the publication of Timothy Williamson’s Knowledge and its Limits, knowledge-first epistemology...
What do we mean when we say that a belief is justified? What justifies a belief? These are two very ...
This paper distinguishes two ways to \u27put knowledge first\u27. One way affirms a knowledge norm. ...
During the last twenty years or so a number of philosophers have proposed theories that attempt to n...
Recent knowledge first epistemology features a number of different accounts of justified belief, inc...
Here I advance a unified account of the structure of the epistemic normativity of assertion, action,...
Abstract: On the standard story about knowledge, knowledge has a normative dimension by virtue of th...
The standard objection against naturalised epistemology is that it cannot account for normativity in...
Epistemic warrant is that property which converts true belief to knowledge. A theory of epistemic wa...
According to a view I’ll call Epistemic Normativism (EN), knowledge is normative in the same sense i...
Proper functionalism explicates epistemic warrant in terms of the function and normal functioning of...
There are two central kinds of epistemological mistakes: believing things you shouldn’t, and failing...
Since the publication of Timothy Williamson’s Knowledge and its Limits, knowledge-first epistemology...
What do we mean when we say that a belief is justified? What justifies a belief? These are two very ...
This paper distinguishes two ways to \u27put knowledge first\u27. One way affirms a knowledge norm. ...
During the last twenty years or so a number of philosophers have proposed theories that attempt to n...