Wesley Newcomb Hohfeld was an American jurist who published a series of articles between 1909 and 1917 that were very important for 20th century analytical philosophy of right. In these articles, Hohfeld analyzed how jurists and judges alike use the word ‘right’ to speak of the rights of groups and individuals. Since he presented his articles, it has been commonplace among ‘hohfeldian specialists’ to distinguish rights into four groups: privileges, or claims, powers and immunities. This paper has four sections. In section I, I present Hohfeld’s notion of privilege and point to a difficulty that has long been known by specialists, namely, that there are actually two significantly different legal relations that this notion is supposed to cove...
The right-privilege distinction, as it appeared in an early statement by Justice Holmes, has long ha...
Wesley Newcomb Hohfeld, born in 1879, died prematurely in 1918. He left only a few law journal artic...
[FIRST PARAGRAPHS] The twentieth century saw a vigorous debate over the nature of rights. Will theo...
Wesley Newcomb Hohfeld was an American jurist who published a series of articles between 1909 and 19...
This paper sets out to reconsider the Hohfeldian framework of rights in celebration of the centenary...
This paper sets out to reconsider the Hohfeldian framework of rights in celebration of the centenary...
Wesley N. Hohfeld tried to split the atom of legal discourse and to identify its elementary particle...
Why do students usually get into a muddle when analysing legal situations in Hohfeldian terms? What ...
In an important article published in 1988, Johan Van der Vyver challenged the prevailing reliance on...
Wesley Newcomb Hohfeld was an American jurist who published a series of articles that were very impo...
Wesley Newcomb Hohfeld’s 1913 article, Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasonin...
In this paper I raise some questions about the internal coherence of Hohfeld’s scheme of legal relat...
INFERRED, OR AT THE MOST rebuttably presumed, is a slight acquaintanceship on the part of the reader...
The Hohfeldian analysis of right is an excellent analytical tool for the comprehension and the imple...
Careful communication is frequently of central importance in law. The language used to communicate e...
The right-privilege distinction, as it appeared in an early statement by Justice Holmes, has long ha...
Wesley Newcomb Hohfeld, born in 1879, died prematurely in 1918. He left only a few law journal artic...
[FIRST PARAGRAPHS] The twentieth century saw a vigorous debate over the nature of rights. Will theo...
Wesley Newcomb Hohfeld was an American jurist who published a series of articles between 1909 and 19...
This paper sets out to reconsider the Hohfeldian framework of rights in celebration of the centenary...
This paper sets out to reconsider the Hohfeldian framework of rights in celebration of the centenary...
Wesley N. Hohfeld tried to split the atom of legal discourse and to identify its elementary particle...
Why do students usually get into a muddle when analysing legal situations in Hohfeldian terms? What ...
In an important article published in 1988, Johan Van der Vyver challenged the prevailing reliance on...
Wesley Newcomb Hohfeld was an American jurist who published a series of articles that were very impo...
Wesley Newcomb Hohfeld’s 1913 article, Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasonin...
In this paper I raise some questions about the internal coherence of Hohfeld’s scheme of legal relat...
INFERRED, OR AT THE MOST rebuttably presumed, is a slight acquaintanceship on the part of the reader...
The Hohfeldian analysis of right is an excellent analytical tool for the comprehension and the imple...
Careful communication is frequently of central importance in law. The language used to communicate e...
The right-privilege distinction, as it appeared in an early statement by Justice Holmes, has long ha...
Wesley Newcomb Hohfeld, born in 1879, died prematurely in 1918. He left only a few law journal artic...
[FIRST PARAGRAPHS] The twentieth century saw a vigorous debate over the nature of rights. Will theo...