The topic of this chapter is the relationship between retributive justice and distributive justice. The author expounds his view that retributive justice should be noncomparative, and that the currency of retributive desert should be suffering. Some theories of distributive justice employ desert as a basis for distribution, whereas other theories of distributive justice do not. The author explains his belief that retributive justice relies on the notion of negative desert, but acknowledges that there are problems if not only negative desert is to be punished but positive desert is to be rewarded. The challenge is how to integrate retributive justice into the different theories of distributive justic
This chapter identifies three contrasts between responsibility-sensitive justice and desert-sensitiv...
This thesis argues against the asymmetry of desert observed across theories of distribution and retr...
Robinson supports the proposed "purposes" text of the New American Law Institute Report on Sentencin...
The topic of this chapter is the relationship between retributive justice and distributive justice. ...
abstract: What we think people can be said to deserve has far-reaching implications. Desert presents...
The enterprise of state punishment requires the use of limited resources for which there are other c...
This paper argues that our primary concern in responding to wrongdoing should be distinct from our c...
Does individual desert matter for distributive justice? Is it relevant, for purposes of justice, tha...
Michael S. Moore is among the most prominent normative theorists to argue that retributive justice, ...
This paper discusses the roles of responsibility and desert in egalitarian theories of justice. It c...
Robinson supports the proposed purposes text of the New American Law Institute Report on Sentencin...
Punishing a person based on low unconditional credence in their deservingness to be punished is cons...
Can desert be the foundation of justice? Recent attempts to redefine distributive justice in the lig...
According to retributivism, what justifies punishment is a wrongdoer\u27s desert. Critics argue that...
The retributive principle is that offenders should be punished because and only because they have cu...
This chapter identifies three contrasts between responsibility-sensitive justice and desert-sensitiv...
This thesis argues against the asymmetry of desert observed across theories of distribution and retr...
Robinson supports the proposed "purposes" text of the New American Law Institute Report on Sentencin...
The topic of this chapter is the relationship between retributive justice and distributive justice. ...
abstract: What we think people can be said to deserve has far-reaching implications. Desert presents...
The enterprise of state punishment requires the use of limited resources for which there are other c...
This paper argues that our primary concern in responding to wrongdoing should be distinct from our c...
Does individual desert matter for distributive justice? Is it relevant, for purposes of justice, tha...
Michael S. Moore is among the most prominent normative theorists to argue that retributive justice, ...
This paper discusses the roles of responsibility and desert in egalitarian theories of justice. It c...
Robinson supports the proposed purposes text of the New American Law Institute Report on Sentencin...
Punishing a person based on low unconditional credence in their deservingness to be punished is cons...
Can desert be the foundation of justice? Recent attempts to redefine distributive justice in the lig...
According to retributivism, what justifies punishment is a wrongdoer\u27s desert. Critics argue that...
The retributive principle is that offenders should be punished because and only because they have cu...
This chapter identifies three contrasts between responsibility-sensitive justice and desert-sensitiv...
This thesis argues against the asymmetry of desert observed across theories of distribution and retr...
Robinson supports the proposed "purposes" text of the New American Law Institute Report on Sentencin...