New perspectives for climate justice, District Court of The Hague, 24 June 2015, Urgenda Foundation versus the Netherlands. The greenhouse gases emission reduction target of the Netherlands violating the duty of care of the State in relation to climate change, it has to be elevated to reach at least -25 % in 2020 compared to 1990, in accordance with the latest scientific knowledge and decisions adopted by the Conference of the parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on climate change in 2010. This is in substance what states the District Court of the Hague in this case opposing the NGO Urgenda and the Netherlands and which marks a turning point of climate justice. Although limited to the mitigation policy of the Netherlands up to...
On 9 October 2018, The Hague Court of Appeal confirmed the first instance judgement rendered in the ...
On June 24th 2015, the civil section of The Hague District Court ruled—in its judgment of 60 pages t...
The remarkable decision of a Dutch lower civil court ordering the State of the Netherlands to reduce...
New perspectives for climate justice, District Court of The Hague, 24 June 2015, Urgenda Foundation ...
International audienceThe climate mitigation target of the Netherlands violating the State's duty of...
Liability for causing or failing to mitigate climate change has long been proposed as an alternative...
International audienceLa chambre commerciale de la Cour de district de la Haye a rendu un arrêt inéd...
On June 24th 2015, the civil section of The Hague District Court ruled—in its judgment of 60 pages t...
Liability for causing or failing to mitigate climate change has long been proposed as an alternative...
Treball guanyador del primer premi del 2021 del Premi Càtedra UNESCO ESCI-UPF i Barcelona School of...
This article situates the judgement of The Hague District Court in Urgenda Foundation v the Kingdom ...
The judgment of the Dutch Supreme Court in State of the Netherlands v Urgenda is a landmark for futu...
One of the world's most successful climate litigation cases thus far, the remarkable Urgenda ruling ...
This study suggests analyzing a number of concepts allowing to make effective a climatic justice in ...
On 9 October 2018, The Hague Court of Appeal confirmed the first instance judgement rendered in the ...
On June 24th 2015, the civil section of The Hague District Court ruled—in its judgment of 60 pages t...
The remarkable decision of a Dutch lower civil court ordering the State of the Netherlands to reduce...
New perspectives for climate justice, District Court of The Hague, 24 June 2015, Urgenda Foundation ...
International audienceThe climate mitigation target of the Netherlands violating the State's duty of...
Liability for causing or failing to mitigate climate change has long been proposed as an alternative...
International audienceLa chambre commerciale de la Cour de district de la Haye a rendu un arrêt inéd...
On June 24th 2015, the civil section of The Hague District Court ruled—in its judgment of 60 pages t...
Liability for causing or failing to mitigate climate change has long been proposed as an alternative...
Treball guanyador del primer premi del 2021 del Premi Càtedra UNESCO ESCI-UPF i Barcelona School of...
This article situates the judgement of The Hague District Court in Urgenda Foundation v the Kingdom ...
The judgment of the Dutch Supreme Court in State of the Netherlands v Urgenda is a landmark for futu...
One of the world's most successful climate litigation cases thus far, the remarkable Urgenda ruling ...
This study suggests analyzing a number of concepts allowing to make effective a climatic justice in ...
On 9 October 2018, The Hague Court of Appeal confirmed the first instance judgement rendered in the ...
On June 24th 2015, the civil section of The Hague District Court ruled—in its judgment of 60 pages t...
The remarkable decision of a Dutch lower civil court ordering the State of the Netherlands to reduce...