Is it possible to end a marriage at the request of one spouse for the fault of the other if there is no legal separation?

Santuokos nutraukimo vieno sutuoktinio prašymu dėl kito sutuoktinio kaltės pagrindai kyla iš vieno sutuoktinio kaltės fakto nustatymo, vienam sutuoktinių pažeidus kurią nors CK numatytą santuokinę pareigą, o kitam sutuoktiniui sutuoktinio kaltę tinkamai įrodžius, t.y. turi būti pateikti tam tikri įrodymai, pagrindžiantys kaltės buvimą. Pažymėtina, jog Lietuvos įstatymų leidėjas, nustatė, kad kaltės faktoriaus nustatymas neatsiejamas nuo išlaikymo priteisimo buvusiam sutuoktiniui. Darbo objektas - magistro baigiamojo darbo objektas santuokos nutraukimo vieno sutuoktinio prašymu dėl kito sutuoktinio kaltės teisiniai aspektai. Pagrindinis darbo tikslas – magistro baigiamojo darbo tikslas – išanalizuoti santuokos nutraukimo vieno sutuoktinio prašymu dėl kito sutuoktinio kaltės kai nėra teisinės separacijos teisinius aspektus ir problemas. Pagrindiniam darbo tikslui pasiekti yra išsikelti šie uždaviniai: 1. Teoriškai išnagrinėti santuokos nutraukimo vieno sutuoktinio prašymu dėl kito sutuoktinio kaltės koncepciją; 2. Išanalizuoti santuokos nutraukimo vieno sutuoktinio prašymu dėl kito sutuoktinio kaltės teisinio reguliavimo aspektus; 3. Išanalizuoti santuokos nutraukimo vieno sutuoktinio prašymu dėl kito sutuoktinio kaltės teisines pasekmes; 4. Remiantis darbe išnagrinėtais šaltiniais, pateikti išsikeltą hipotezę patvirtinančią arba paneigiančią išvadą ir pateikti rekomendacijas dėl galimų teisinio reglamentavimo pakeitimų Lietuvoje. Pagrindinė hipotezė – santuokos nutraukimas vieno sutuoktinio prašymu dėl kito sutuoktinio kaltės galimas, nustačius kito sutuoktinio kaltę. Atlikus mokslinės literatūros, teisės aktų ir teismų praktikos pavyzdžių analizę, darbo hipotezė buvo patvirtinta. Atsakant į darbe iškeltą tikslą ir hipotezę, galima teigti, jog santuokos nutraukimas vieno sutuoktinio prašymu dėl kito sutuoktinio kaltės galimas, kai nustatoma ir įrodoma kito sutuoktinio kaltė. Pagrindinės išvados: teismui nustačius sutuoktinio kaltę dėl santuokos iširimo, kitas sutuoktinis turi teisę, bet ne pareigą inicijuoti santuokos nutraukimą dėl kito sutuoktinio kaltės. Pažymėtina, jog net ir šiuo atveju sutuoktiniai gali kreiptis dėl santuokos nutraukimo kitu pagrindu, pavyzdžiui, teismo prašyti santuoką nutraukti bendru sutarimu. Praktinės teisinės problemos kyla, sprendžiant sutuoktinio išlaikymo nustatymo ir priteisimo, o taip pat ir išlaikymo dydžio klausimus. Atkreiptinas dėmesys, jog teismas, spręsdamas klausimą dėl sutuoktinių išlaikymo dydžio priteismo turi atsižvelgti į tokius faktorius, kaip: išlaikymo reikalingumą, buvusių sutuoktinių turtinę padėtį, santuokos trukmę, sutuoktinių sveikatą bei amžių ir kitas esmines aplinkybes. Teisinės problemos kyla ir dėl pavardės pasirinkimo, kadangi pagal galiojančius įstatymus po santuokos nutraukimo sutuoktinis turi teisę pasilikti savo santuokinę pavardę arba ją pakeisti į ikisantuokinę pavardę. Pažymėtina, jog teismas gali uždrausti pasilikti santuokinę pavardę dėl santuokos iširimo kaltam sutuoktiniui tais atvejais, jeigu sutuoktiniai neturi bendrų vaikų.At the request of one of the spouses for divorce, the grounds for the fault of the other spouse derive from a single spouse's fault finding one spouse violating one of the CC obligations of the spouse, and the other spouse has duly proved the spouse's fault, i.e. there must be some evidence to justify the existence of the fault. It should be noted that the Lithuanian legislator has determined that the determination of the fault factor is inseparable from the award of maintenance to the former spouse. The subject of the thesis is the legal aspects of the dissolution of one spouse at the request of one spouse for the other spouse's fault. The main purpose of the thesis is to analyze the divorce at the request of one spouse for the other spouse's fault when there are no legal aspects and problems of legal separation. In order to achieve the main goal of the work, the following tasks are developed: 1. To theoretically examine the concept of divorce at the request of one spouse for the fault of another spouse; 2. Analyze the aspects of legal regulation of divorce at the request of one spouse for the fault of another spouse; 3. Analyze the legal consequences of divorce at the request of one spouse for the other spouse's fault; 4. On the basis of the sources analyzed in the thesis, to present a conclusion confirming or denying the hypothesis and to make recommendations on possible changes in legal regulation in Lithuania. The main hypothesis - termination of the marriage at the request of one of the spouses for the fault of the other spouse is possible by the fault of the other spouse. After the analysis of scientific literature, legal acts and case law, the work hypothesis was confirmed. In response to the purpose and hypothesis raised at work, it can be stated that divorce at the request of one spouse for the fault of another spouse is possible when the fault of the other spouse is established and proved. The first section of this work states that the grounds for divorce at the request of one of the spouses for the fault of the other spouse derive from the fact that one spouse has committed one of the spouses‘ obligations under one of the Civil Code and the other spouse has properly proved the spouses fault. Certainly, there must be some evidence to justify the existence of the fault. It should be noted that it is very important to determine and prove the fault of the spouse, because divorce at the request of one of the spouses due to the fault of the other spouse is possible only after the fault of the spouse has been proved. The second chapter analyzes the legal regulation of divorce at the request of one of the spouses on the other spouse‘s fault and defines the spouse‘s fault as a violation or non-fulfillment of the essential duties of the spouses when the spouses‘ behavior is not reconciled with family purposes. Defining and justifying guilt is very important, as it essentially determines the emergence of certain rights, duties and obligations for the persons who have been divorced for divorce, so determining the basis of the divorce is crucial, since the spouse‘s fault is not only about the division of the spouses‘ assets or existing liabilities. but also maintenance issues. It should also be noted that the separation governed by the Civil Code cannot be confused with the actual separation of spouses, which has not been confirmed by the court, since separation is a judicial separation of the spouses‘ life as a result of subjective or objective circumstances. Cases where the life of the spouses becomes intolerable or may harm the interests of the under-age children, or when the spouses have no interest in pursuing joint life, can be considered subjective or objective circumstances. The third chapter analyzes the property and non-property consequences of divorce at the request of one spouse for the other spouse‘s fault. The main non-pecuniary litigation for divorce is caused by the fault of one spouse due to the name of the former spouse, compensation for non- pecuniary damage, determination of the child‘s residence and restriction of meetings with under-age children. Meanwhile, at the request of one of the spouses for divorce on property, legal disputes arise on the division and division of part of the property of the spouses, as well as on mutual maintenance granted to the former spouses. It is also possible to compensate the spouse for a higher share of the property acquired in the marriage. General findings: in the case of a spouse, the other spouse has the right, but not the obligation, to require the marriage of the other spouse to be terminated. Therefore, even in the circumstances prescribed by law, the spouses may apply for divorce on a different basis, by requesting the court to terminate the marriage by consensus; Practical legal problems arise from solving the issues of maintenance of the spouse and its size, that the court must take into account the duration of the marriage, the necessity of maintenance, the property situation of both former spouses, their state of health, age, as well as their employability, employability of the spouse who is not working and other important issues. circumstances; Legal problems also arise with the choice of surname, as the spouse may retain his or her marital or pre-marital surname after the divorce. If the marriage has been terminated because of the fault of one of the spouses, the court may, at the request of the other spouse, prohibit the spouse from remaining in the marriage, except where the spouses have common children.Teisės fakulteta