In the 2017 legislative session, the Arkansas General Assembly significantly changed the Arkansas Deceptive Trade Practices Act (“ADTPA”). These changes now prohibit private class actions under the ADTPA and require plaintiffs to prove additional elements of reliance and actual financial loss when bringing a claim. The changes appear to limit the ability of a consumer to bring a private action under the ADPTA. With these changes, Arkansas joins a minority of jurisdictions with deceptive trade practices acts that increase a plaintiff’s burden and restrict private class actions
Without question, reforming America\u27s civil justice system has become a hot button issue in today...
A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes. - ironically, not...
The Act prohibits providers of legal services from advertising in an untrue, fraudulent, deceptive, ...
This article has two significant goals. First, it addresses the circuit split on the proper test for...
The Texas Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act (DTPA)1 focuses on consumer harm brought...
Few fields of law impact as wide a swath of population as consumer protection law. Alaska adopted it...
State Consumer Protection Acts (CPAs) were adopted in the 1960s and 1970s to protect consumers from ...
ABSTRACT: State Consumer Protection Acts (CPAs) were designed to supplement the Federal Trade Commis...
The Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act, presently in force in eight states, makes a private injun...
This article examines Oregon\u27s UTPA with an eye toward legislative and judicial reforms that will...
In 1993 The Small Business Entity Tax Pass Through Act for the first time authorized the organizat...
Despite remaining stable and unchanged over the last decade, tortious interference has also remained...
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has regulated competitive business activities since its inception...
Alaska’s Unfair and Deceptive Acts and Practices (UDAP) statute was designed to provide broad, robus...
This past legislative session Senate Bill 601, sponsored by Senator Jonathan Dismang, was enacted in...
Without question, reforming America\u27s civil justice system has become a hot button issue in today...
A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes. - ironically, not...
The Act prohibits providers of legal services from advertising in an untrue, fraudulent, deceptive, ...
This article has two significant goals. First, it addresses the circuit split on the proper test for...
The Texas Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act (DTPA)1 focuses on consumer harm brought...
Few fields of law impact as wide a swath of population as consumer protection law. Alaska adopted it...
State Consumer Protection Acts (CPAs) were adopted in the 1960s and 1970s to protect consumers from ...
ABSTRACT: State Consumer Protection Acts (CPAs) were designed to supplement the Federal Trade Commis...
The Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act, presently in force in eight states, makes a private injun...
This article examines Oregon\u27s UTPA with an eye toward legislative and judicial reforms that will...
In 1993 The Small Business Entity Tax Pass Through Act for the first time authorized the organizat...
Despite remaining stable and unchanged over the last decade, tortious interference has also remained...
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has regulated competitive business activities since its inception...
Alaska’s Unfair and Deceptive Acts and Practices (UDAP) statute was designed to provide broad, robus...
This past legislative session Senate Bill 601, sponsored by Senator Jonathan Dismang, was enacted in...
Without question, reforming America\u27s civil justice system has become a hot button issue in today...
A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes. - ironically, not...
The Act prohibits providers of legal services from advertising in an untrue, fraudulent, deceptive, ...