Coercive means against the crowd-comparison of the legal systems

V diplomskem delu z naslovom »Prisilna sredstva proti množici- Primerjalno pravna ureditev« sem analiziral pravno ureditev prisilnih sredstev v Republiki Sloveniji ter osnovna načela, ki jih policisti morajo spoštovati pri uporabi prisilnih sredstev. V nadaljevanju sem opredelil vsa prisilna sredstva, ki jih slovenska policija sme uporabiti proti množici. Pri tem sem podrobneje opisal, kako ta prisilna sredstva ureja zakon, način uporabe določenega prisilnega sredstva in kako posamezno sredstvo deluje na osebe proti katerim se ga uporabi, ter kdo ima pravico in je pooblaščen, da odredi uporabo posamezna sredstva. V diplomskem delu sem podrobneje predstavil tudi posebno policijsko enoto, ki sodeluje pri vzdrževanju javnega reda na demonstracijah ter protestnih shodih. Pri tem sem opisal pravno podlago za ustanovitev enote ter sestavo enote. Pozornost sem usmeril tudi na usposabljanje te enote ter na njen poseben način kadrovanja. V diplomskem delu sem pozornost usmeril tudi na prav poseben fenomen psihologije množice. Delovanje množice ter način postopanja proti množici sta prav gotovo za policijo dve znanji, ki imata ključen pomen za uspešno nadzorovanje množice. V diplomskem delu sem predstavil nekaj definicij množic ter opredelil oblike množic, način delovanja množice ter njene lastnosti. Bistvo diplomskega dela je primerjava pravnih ureditev prisilnih sredstev proti množici s tujimi državami. Pravno ureditev prisilnih sredstev proti množici v Republiki Sloveniji sem primerjal še s tremi evropskimi državami – Republiko Hrvaško, Republiko Avstrijo ter Francosko Republiko. Pri tujih ureditvah sem iskal podobnosti s slovensko ureditvijo, še posebej pa sem pozornost posvečal razlikam na katere sem naletel med pregledom tujih zakonodaj. Na koncu diplome sledi še pregled policijske analize o aktivnostih policije na protestnih shodih leta 2012. V tem delu sem preučil uporabo prisilnih sredstev, poseben poudarek pa sem namenil prisilnim sredstvom proti množici. Pri tem me je predvsem zanimalo, kolikokrat je v omenjenem letu slovenska policija uporabila prisilna sredstva proti množici ter ali je bila njihova uporaba zakonita in strokovna.In the diploma with a title »Coercive means against the crowd – Comparison of the legal systems« I analyzed the legal system of the coercive means in the Republic of Slovenia and the basic principles that the police officers should respect when using coercive means. In the diploma I defined all the coercive means that the Slovenian police can use against the crowd. In my work, I have described how these coercive means are regulated by the law in the Republic of Slovenia. I have also described the way in which a certain coercive means are used, and how they affect the people against whom they are used. I also described who has the power and is authorized to order usage of certain coercive means. In the diploma, I have presented a special police unit, which is responsible for the maintenance of public order at demonstrations and protest rallies. I have described the legal basis for the establishment of the unit and the composition of the unit. I also gave some attention to the training of this unit and its special way of recruitment new men into it. In the diploma, I also focused my attention on a very special phenomenon, called the psychology of the crowd. The modus operandi of the masses and actions against the crowd are, of course, two of the skills that the police have to master in order to successfully control the crowd. In the diploma I also introduced some definitions of the crowd and defined the forms of the crowds and the way that they operate. I also presented some of the characteristics of the crowds. The essence of the diploma is the comparison of the legal systems of coercive means against the crowd with foreign countries. I compared the Slovenian legal system of coercive means against the crowd with the legal systems of three other European countries - the Republic of Croatia, the Republic of Austria and the French Republic. In foreign regulations of the coercive means against the crowd, I looked for similarities with the Slovenian regulation. However, I paid more attention to the differences I encountered during the review of foreign legislations. At the end of the diploma, there is a review of the police analysis of police activities at the protest gatherings in the year 2012. Here I analyzed the use of coercive means, especially the use of coercive means against the crowd, by the Slovenian police. While examining the report, I was particularly interested in the number of times that the Slovenian police had used the coercive means against the crowd and whether that use was legal and professional