Analysis of methodologies for calculating the heat release rates of mining vehicle fires in underground mines

Four different methodologies for calculating the ignition of different components on a mining vehicle in a mine drift were analysed. The results were compared with two full-scale fire experiments on mining vehicles. The four different methods are based on physical relations for fire spread between combustible components of the mining vehicles. The first two methods use a critical heat flux as ignition criterion while the other two methods use an ignition temperature. A sensitivity analysis was performed and the most influencing parameter of the methods was further analyzed. The calculated results were compared with the measured results from the experiments. The two methodologies applying an ignition temperature criterion were ruled out at as the surface temperatures of all fuel components never achieved the corresponding ignition temperatures. For the two methods applying a critical heat flux criterion it was found that the expression not including a flame radiation term was not suitable as it was found that the flame radiation played an important part with respect to spread mechanisms. The expression containing a flame radiation term was found to come very close to the observed ignition times, except in the case of the left, rear tyre of the drilling rig where it predicted a much higher ignition time than the one observed. The difference is unclear and would have to be investigated further. It was also found that the surface heat losses had none effect on the output results and could therefore be neglected in the calculations. In the case of the wheel loader the calculated heat release rate curves did not match the measured curve as well as in the case of the drilling rig. The difficulty in this case consists of accurately predicting the mechanical failure of a component - in this case a suction hose - that would initiate the very significant hydraulic oil pool fire