ANALISIS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NOMOR: 328/PDT.G/2013/PN.DPS MENGENAI PEMBATALAN PERJANJIAN PINJAM NAMA DITINJAU DARI PERSPEKTIF ASAS KEADILAN, KEPASTIAN DAN KEMANFAATAN HUKUM

This legal writing purposed to analyze the cancellation of the Nomine Agreement of the implementation three principles to determine whether or not this choice has been applied in balanced manner in the verdict of the Denpasar District Court Number 328/Pdt.G/2013/PN.DPS. The research method used in this study is normative juridical research using the concept of positivist legislation approach. Primary legal materials, namely the 1945 Constitution, UUPA or the Basic Agrarian Law Act), etc. Secondary legal are materials from the literature of books, theses, journals, etc. Tertiary legal material is a legal material that provides an explanation of primary and secondary law. Legal material collection techniques carried out by library research with content analysis. The discussion show that an analysis of the judge's decision to reject all requests submitted by IRMA because she can’t prove her arguments which is author assume that this is do not contain the value of the three principles because the agreement made is contrary to Article 1320 of the Civil Code and included in the nominee agreementso that the author feels this decision should be dropped the party grants the defendant's request in part. Conclusion, are the judge was incorrect in implementing the law when deciding this case because it does not fulfill the principle of justice, certainty and the benefit of the law.Suggestion, the judge supposed to be more careful in the trial to issue a quality legal product by fulfilling the principle of legal certainty, justice, and benefit, and for the community to be more aware of the law and must be more careful in making agreements